Hi,
I'd really appreciate some advice if anyone can help?
My partner has received a Single Justice Procedure Notice this morning in relation to an apparent speeding offence that is recorded to have happened on the 5/12/18.
The Charges advised are:
1. Fail to give information relating to the identification of the driver of a vehicle when required (It looks like this applies to Speed enforcement not having reported this at the time, so it's their failure)
2. Speeding - exceed 30 mph on restricted road - manned equipment
After researching and viewing http://www.driving-law.co.uk/terms/t...ecute-you.aspx this does state:
· So long as the information is laid within six months, the issue and service of the summons and the subsequent determination may all occur outside that period.
· Laying an information within the six months' time limit before deciding whether or not to prosecute may result in the proceedings being stayed as an abuse of process; see R-v-Brentford Magistrates' Court ex parte Wong [1981] 1 All ER 884.
It's the 6th June today which is when the notice was received and this states that this was posted on the 4th June. This is practically 6 months later surely? On receiving today this takes it over the 6 month period.
Does anyone know where we would stand on this matter? Any advice would be very much appreciated.
Beth
I'd really appreciate some advice if anyone can help?
My partner has received a Single Justice Procedure Notice this morning in relation to an apparent speeding offence that is recorded to have happened on the 5/12/18.
The Charges advised are:
1. Fail to give information relating to the identification of the driver of a vehicle when required (It looks like this applies to Speed enforcement not having reported this at the time, so it's their failure)
2. Speeding - exceed 30 mph on restricted road - manned equipment
After researching and viewing http://www.driving-law.co.uk/terms/t...ecute-you.aspx this does state:
· So long as the information is laid within six months, the issue and service of the summons and the subsequent determination may all occur outside that period.
· Laying an information within the six months' time limit before deciding whether or not to prosecute may result in the proceedings being stayed as an abuse of process; see R-v-Brentford Magistrates' Court ex parte Wong [1981] 1 All ER 884.
It's the 6th June today which is when the notice was received and this states that this was posted on the 4th June. This is practically 6 months later surely? On receiving today this takes it over the 6 month period.
Does anyone know where we would stand on this matter? Any advice would be very much appreciated.
Beth
Comment