Re: Misallocating payments and ignoring email to exploit Magistrates court costs
You can keep on embarrassing yourself, but don't think you're going to waste any more of my time than the small amount I have to find this (all related threads saved by the way):
The Reverend is welcome
I'd already located the following and decided against posting, but thinking again it's appropriate you're reminded.
Who is in contact with the Reverend?
And....
One of those 'Scribed' documents
Originally posted by Milo
View Post
The Reverend is welcome
Originally Posted by tomtubby
outlawla.
I have sent a lot of your information to Paul in the last few days and his comment below if from an email that I received from him a few moments ago:
"Very many thanks for all this. I will read, mark, learn and inwardly digest" !!
outlawla.
I have sent a lot of your information to Paul in the last few days and his comment below if from an email that I received from him a few moments ago:
"Very many thanks for all this. I will read, mark, learn and inwardly digest" !!
The Reverend is welcome to any (hopefully relevant) information I have. Since HMCTS has blocked an attempt to bring a case before the High Court (Application 22 November 2012) there has been a fair amount of time for additional material to surface which will reinforce the case. Some of that happens to be directly connected with Haringey.
During the 20 or so months the Magistrates' Court has been obstructing the case coming before the High Court by stonewalling and ultimately lying, it has shown the justice system to be wholly dysfunctional; having lost sight of its role...
During the 20 or so months the Magistrates' Court has been obstructing the case coming before the High Court by stonewalling and ultimately lying, it has shown the justice system to be wholly dysfunctional; having lost sight of its role...
Who is in contact with the Reverend?
Originally Posted by tomtubby
I am sorry but I would be very surprised indeed if the Reverend or his legal team had read any posts of yours on forums. I truly am suprised at your reply given that I genuinly believed that you had been in touch with the Reverend from the early stages of his complaint. I am sure that other regulars on here share my opinion that there can be nobody else with such in depth knowledge of the subject matter (summons costs) than you. You really must contact the Reverend asap.
I am sorry but I would be very surprised indeed if the Reverend or his legal team had read any posts of yours on forums. I truly am suprised at your reply given that I genuinly believed that you had been in touch with the Reverend from the early stages of his complaint. I am sure that other regulars on here share my opinion that there can be nobody else with such in depth knowledge of the subject matter (summons costs) than you. You really must contact the Reverend asap.
I thought it was yourself who had been in touch and spoken to the Reverend.
Originally posted by Milo
View Post
outlawla,
I have only had a chance to glance through the Grounds for Appeal and will have a good read with a glass of white later this evening !!!
My first impression is that this is an EXCELLENT document !!!!
The current position is that many local authorities are currently reeling under the pressure of FOI requests and complaints regarding the level of fees charge and this is causing them GREAT CONCERN.
I have only had a chance to glance through the Grounds for Appeal and will have a good read with a glass of white later this evening !!!
My first impression is that this is an EXCELLENT document !!!!
The current position is that many local authorities are currently reeling under the pressure of FOI requests and complaints regarding the level of fees charge and this is causing them GREAT CONCERN.
Comment