I'm purchasing an over-60 flat (leasehold of course). The part of the conveyancing that would be needed if I was a 100% cash purchaser is finished, but the lender now has many very time consuming questions. Should the conveyancer have anticipated these? Either as part of their job, or as things that an alert conveyancer would anticipate over and above their bare minimum duty? Specifically:
--- It is an over-60 property but the deeds only contain the language "for the elderly" not "over 60" and the lender won't accept this, it is too vague.
--- There are two different names in the sales documents, as the flat is being sold by the father (lives in UK) of the owner (his son in Australia.) The lender wants a certificate they are the same person.
I sometimes proof read documents, and I'd have thought even a proofreader would have queried these glaring discrepancies at an early stage. But the conveyancer [ part of a huge company] has been blindsided by them and it is horribly slow to remedy.
Am I right to feel aggrieved? I thought the conveyancers job was to anticipate problems, but are there limits to this?
Many thanks
Andy, Bristol
--- It is an over-60 property but the deeds only contain the language "for the elderly" not "over 60" and the lender won't accept this, it is too vague.
--- There are two different names in the sales documents, as the flat is being sold by the father (lives in UK) of the owner (his son in Australia.) The lender wants a certificate they are the same person.
I sometimes proof read documents, and I'd have thought even a proofreader would have queried these glaring discrepancies at an early stage. But the conveyancer [ part of a huge company] has been blindsided by them and it is horribly slow to remedy.
Am I right to feel aggrieved? I thought the conveyancers job was to anticipate problems, but are there limits to this?
Many thanks
Andy, Bristol
Comment