In April an estate agent found a buyer for my daughter's leasehold maisonette. They and her solicitor urged her to complete the sale and move out by the weekend just passed (21/22 May). A problem arose concerning double glazing* and daughter did not complete. Enquiries now reveal that the estate agent has, since 25 November 2015, been in an involuntary arrangement with HMRC. (The Property Ombudsman says "involuntary", Companies House website says "voluntary"). A strike out notice is going into the Gazette tomorrow. The firm apparently owes HMRC in the region of £277,000.
Enquiries reveal that there are three companies, xxxx xxxx east, xxxx xxxx west, as well as xxxx xxxx ltd. East and West are registered as estate agents whilst Ltd is registered as a management company to whom all monies must be paid. The Property Ombudsman has advised daughter not to complete the sale until after the end of the strike out period (two months) because she may find herself paying commission twice - once to the management company and secondly to HMRC, the main creditor.
*The estate agent untruthfully told the prospective buyers that the landlord is going to have new windows installed in the property. It looks as though this may have been an inducement to the prospective purchasers to agree to buy and that the estate agent was hustling daughter to complete the sale without her knowing about the "promise" to install new windows.
Can anyone advise on (a) should my daughter pull out of the sale and if so to what extent she would be liable for commission, VAT and marketing costs, (b) should daughter disclose the above to the potential purchasers via solicitors, thereby giving them the opportunity to pull out or proceed at a later date, (c) If the potential purchasers pull out, to what extent could my daughter be held financially liable?
This is a private firm and I hope it is a cautionary tale to anyone selling their property.
Thank you in advance for any advice you are able to offer.
Enquiries reveal that there are three companies, xxxx xxxx east, xxxx xxxx west, as well as xxxx xxxx ltd. East and West are registered as estate agents whilst Ltd is registered as a management company to whom all monies must be paid. The Property Ombudsman has advised daughter not to complete the sale until after the end of the strike out period (two months) because she may find herself paying commission twice - once to the management company and secondly to HMRC, the main creditor.
*The estate agent untruthfully told the prospective buyers that the landlord is going to have new windows installed in the property. It looks as though this may have been an inducement to the prospective purchasers to agree to buy and that the estate agent was hustling daughter to complete the sale without her knowing about the "promise" to install new windows.
Can anyone advise on (a) should my daughter pull out of the sale and if so to what extent she would be liable for commission, VAT and marketing costs, (b) should daughter disclose the above to the potential purchasers via solicitors, thereby giving them the opportunity to pull out or proceed at a later date, (c) If the potential purchasers pull out, to what extent could my daughter be held financially liable?
This is a private firm and I hope it is a cautionary tale to anyone selling their property.
Thank you in advance for any advice you are able to offer.
Comment