• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Imported terms in a tenancy agreement

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Imported terms in a tenancy agreement

    It is common practice with some letting agents to create a new fixed term AST at the end of an initial AST by importing terms (i.e. both parties do not wish the tenancy to become periodic).

    One could either

    a) start afresh with a completely new AST (start date, end date, all terms)
    b) have a one pager which says : New start date, New end date, we carry over all terms from previous agreement X, and we add or subtract the following couple of terms. The agreement is signed and agreed by the parties.

    The question is whether (b) has exactly the same force as (a) and is effectively the same as reiterating the whole agreement.

    Do all terms of any contract (whether a tenancy agreement or otherwise) have to be within that contract - it seems to me that if any contract imports terms which exists within a clearly and unambiguously defined external document, that the effect is identical to having included those terms within the document. The reason I am asking is that there seems to be disagreement on another forum, and I thought I would assess the views of folks over here.
    Last edited by roberto; 6th March 2015, 13:08:PM. Reason: live spacing
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: Imported terms in a tenancy agreement

    Hi roberto

    I dont quite understand this

    It is common practice with some letting agents to create a new fixed term AST at the end of an initial AST by importing terms (i.e. both parties do not wish the tenancy to become periodic).
    My experience in these matters is only solid up to 2003/4, although i still have my head in the market.

    For a tenancy to end and re-start, you could not just do it on paperwork, the tenant and there belongings have to be out of the house.for 24 hours

    The question is whether (b) has exactly the same force as (a) and is effectively the same as reiterating the whole agreement.
    I beleive you can add, by consent, terms to the previously agreed tenancy, as long as its not considered that your putting presure on the tenant for unfair terms.

    The reason I am asking is that there seems to be disagreement on another forum, and I thought I would assess the views of folks over here.
    Take this advice.

    Dont mess with contracts after they are in place unless you 100% know what your doing You could make it very hard to evict the tenant if needed. Can i ask, why would you not want the tenancy to turn into a periodic.. It doesn't make a lot of sence unless there is somthing am missing
    crazy council ( as in local council,NELC ) as a member of the public, i don't get mad, i get even

    Comment

    View our Terms and Conditions

    LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

    If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


    If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
    Working...
    X