Hi Guys,
Finally had our hearing last week, unfortunately we lost :-( Solicitors sprung a new legal argument a few days before the hearing and I struggled to understand it and it really only became clear after the Judge's summing up. At least we gave them a scare :-)
We have been given extra to time appeal as the argument is open to interpretation. This is under consideration.
What we have to deal with is the claimant has been given a repossession order, and we have been given extra time to ask for the repo order to be suspended. I assume this is done via N244?
The contract I have recently signed is for 3 months. It is expected to continue beyond this, but there is no guarantee. I am offering a norgen agreement to pay out the arrears over nearly 10 years. The gross income from the contract is significant, however that is paid to my company. My nett income is less than half this, albeit dividends are paid 2-4 times per year.
My nett income is sufficient to cover our current outgoings plus arrears and interest on arrears over the remaining ~10 years of the mortgage.
The reason for our arrears (family illness) has gone away, so it's now full steam ahead, subject to keeping our home :-)
Questions I have:
1. Will the 3 month contract be sufficient for the Court to suspend the repo?
2. Will making an up front lump sum toward arrears make any difference?
3. Will mentioning that I tried to settle the repo proceedings earlier in the year, however the Claimant would only accept on condition that I agreed never to bring up s140A in relation to the agreement. They were even prepared to write off the arrears...
4. Will mentioning the delays caused by the Claimant starting the action in a court in a different county and their repeated failures to comply with court orders and information requests make any difference? Not to mention springing the new legal argument on me a few days before the hearing.
5. The Claimant swore under oath that some charges had been refunded. They also swore that the monthly payment was nearly 100 more than it should be. I have the documentation to show this monthly payment is wrong and that this payment has been deducted (and continues to be deducted) for the last 18 months or so. Is this the right time to bring this up?
6. Similarly to (5) for some arrears fees.
7. In relation to the legal fees, the Judge said I need to make an 'Application for Account'. How do I go about this? I assume it is an application to the Court?
8. Is the fact that I made an offer prior to the hearing and the various antics of the Claimant (see q4) sufficient to make an argument that costs shouldn't be applied? Would the Claimant's requirement that I settle something (ie the s140A argument) beyond the repossession proceedings be deemed unreasonable?
Thanks in anticipation...
ps for those who have mortgages prior to Oct 2004, S140A of CCA does apply to these mortgages (and indeed almost all credit agreements CCA regulated or not). There is a get out of jail free for the lender in the transitional provisions, so if you want to go down this route you need to check these carefully...
Finally had our hearing last week, unfortunately we lost :-( Solicitors sprung a new legal argument a few days before the hearing and I struggled to understand it and it really only became clear after the Judge's summing up. At least we gave them a scare :-)
We have been given extra to time appeal as the argument is open to interpretation. This is under consideration.
What we have to deal with is the claimant has been given a repossession order, and we have been given extra time to ask for the repo order to be suspended. I assume this is done via N244?
The contract I have recently signed is for 3 months. It is expected to continue beyond this, but there is no guarantee. I am offering a norgen agreement to pay out the arrears over nearly 10 years. The gross income from the contract is significant, however that is paid to my company. My nett income is less than half this, albeit dividends are paid 2-4 times per year.
My nett income is sufficient to cover our current outgoings plus arrears and interest on arrears over the remaining ~10 years of the mortgage.
The reason for our arrears (family illness) has gone away, so it's now full steam ahead, subject to keeping our home :-)
Questions I have:
1. Will the 3 month contract be sufficient for the Court to suspend the repo?
2. Will making an up front lump sum toward arrears make any difference?
3. Will mentioning that I tried to settle the repo proceedings earlier in the year, however the Claimant would only accept on condition that I agreed never to bring up s140A in relation to the agreement. They were even prepared to write off the arrears...
4. Will mentioning the delays caused by the Claimant starting the action in a court in a different county and their repeated failures to comply with court orders and information requests make any difference? Not to mention springing the new legal argument on me a few days before the hearing.
5. The Claimant swore under oath that some charges had been refunded. They also swore that the monthly payment was nearly 100 more than it should be. I have the documentation to show this monthly payment is wrong and that this payment has been deducted (and continues to be deducted) for the last 18 months or so. Is this the right time to bring this up?
6. Similarly to (5) for some arrears fees.
7. In relation to the legal fees, the Judge said I need to make an 'Application for Account'. How do I go about this? I assume it is an application to the Court?
8. Is the fact that I made an offer prior to the hearing and the various antics of the Claimant (see q4) sufficient to make an argument that costs shouldn't be applied? Would the Claimant's requirement that I settle something (ie the s140A argument) beyond the repossession proceedings be deemed unreasonable?
Thanks in anticipation...
ps for those who have mortgages prior to Oct 2004, S140A of CCA does apply to these mortgages (and indeed almost all credit agreements CCA regulated or not). There is a get out of jail free for the lender in the transitional provisions, so if you want to go down this route you need to check these carefully...
Comment