Hi there, hope there is someone who can help clarify this for me!
I live in a block of 6 flats which is maintained by a property management company. I rent the flat and (indirectly, through my landlord) pay a service charge to this company.
Last week the bike shed belonging to my block of flats was broken in to, and several bikes were stolen, including my own This was despite the fact that my bike was securely locked to a purpose-built bike rack inside with a large, standards-approved bike lock.
About 5 or 6 weeks ago the management company changed the lock on the bike shed from a sturdy, thick combination bolt lock, to a normal padlock. I am still waiting for a response from them as to why they did this.
I am convinced that if they hadn't changed the lock, the burglary would have been averted, or at least made a damn sight harder to commit!
I must confess this is not the only complaint I've had with this company and their (lack of) handling of maintenance and security issues, so this rather seems like the last straw. They are not providing an adequate service for the money I pay, but I don't know how to go about challenging it.
I understand that they are not liable for personal possessions, but are they liable for inadequate maintenance or failing to secure the property?? Please could someone clarify the company's liability in this case, and what chance I have of getting the company to admit that they didn't secure the property.
[FONT='Arial','sans-serif']Thanks!
[/FONT]
I live in a block of 6 flats which is maintained by a property management company. I rent the flat and (indirectly, through my landlord) pay a service charge to this company.
Last week the bike shed belonging to my block of flats was broken in to, and several bikes were stolen, including my own This was despite the fact that my bike was securely locked to a purpose-built bike rack inside with a large, standards-approved bike lock.
About 5 or 6 weeks ago the management company changed the lock on the bike shed from a sturdy, thick combination bolt lock, to a normal padlock. I am still waiting for a response from them as to why they did this.
I am convinced that if they hadn't changed the lock, the burglary would have been averted, or at least made a damn sight harder to commit!
I must confess this is not the only complaint I've had with this company and their (lack of) handling of maintenance and security issues, so this rather seems like the last straw. They are not providing an adequate service for the money I pay, but I don't know how to go about challenging it.
I understand that they are not liable for personal possessions, but are they liable for inadequate maintenance or failing to secure the property?? Please could someone clarify the company's liability in this case, and what chance I have of getting the company to admit that they didn't secure the property.
[FONT='Arial','sans-serif']Thanks!
[/FONT]
Comment