• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Damage to garden by neighbour's falling tree - Insurer changing position on coverage

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Every comment causes me to check the exact detail of the policy.

    So the policy states a limit of £1,000 on garden plants in contents. I would never have thought that this meant to include trees but the policy wording suggests that it does.

    Comment


    • #17
      To say that this eventuality was not something that I considered when looking at the policy is an understatement.

      The tree that fell is on the other side of the road. We have some large trees but nothing like this size. Out of maybe a hundred trees in the vicinity there is nothing else that could have caused this type of damage.

      The more I look the more it looks like I might have to make a negligence claim against my neighbour.

      I consistently trim back my own trees to make sure they don’t have branches hanging too near the house or over the road as I am worried about damage they may cause.

      Comment


      • #18
        I still think your insurance should cover damaged fencing and paving as part of your buildings insurance. Don't accept Admiral's argument that your fence was damaged by the storm

        Comment


        • #19
          You have been very helpful thanks.

          Their argument is not that it was damaged by the storm.

          Their argument is that they have excluded impact damage to hedges and fences from falling trees.

          If a car crashed into the hedge I would be covered.

          If a tree fell and hit my house I would be covered.

          But if a tree falls and damages hedges/fences they are not covered.

          The main arguments I have are -

          1. They offered to cover this, going as far as to organise a surveyor and have now changed their mind.

          2. It was not my tree that fell but a third party tree that I have no control over and thus should be covered as damage caused by a third party and possibly claimed against that third party.

          Comment


          • #20
            You need to do some research on the 'tree', what was the condition of the tree? etc.

            https://www.broadleaftreesurgery.co....Fraised%20soil.

            Comment


            • #21
              Thanks.

              I guess if I had to go along the negligence claim route I would need to get a report drawn up.

              From my observations. The tree leaned towards the side it fell. This is not necessarily unusual as trees tend to grow away from
              the prevailing wind but it leaned more than any other tree on the street where it was growing. Pictures are available from Streetview.

              The garden of my neighbour sits over 1m above the road behind a dry stone wall. The tree was adjacent to the wall, also over 1m above the road, so would basically have had no roots on the side it fell towards. A couple of roots grew through the wall. This would appear to be an inherently unstable situation.

              The tree surgeon working to clear it up remarked that they had seen it previously when working at my house and thought it looked unstable, but might not want to get involved as they have also worked for the neighbour in the past. The insurance company surveyor said that the dry stone wall was not adequate as a retaining wall. It certainly would not meet building control requirements today.

              From looking at things now. It could be that what happened is the inadequate wall may have collapsed first leading to the tree falling over.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Edinburgh24 View Post
                I tried this and his insurer will not accept a claim from me, only from my insurer. My insurer has consistently refused to do this, even though, as I have pointed out, this would clear their liability.

                If the situation continues to make a claim from his insurer I believe that would have to lodge a legal negligence claim.

                If there is a way to do this without taking legal action then I would be very pleased to hear it.
                Of course your neighbour's insurer will not accept a claim from you.
                They do not insure you.
                You need to write to your neighbour, holding him liable.
                Your neighbour may then make a claim against his insurer, if his policy covers third party liability
                If the insurers decline the claim, or if he does not have that third party cover and refuses to pay, you sue your neighbour. If he has that cover the insurers come to court on his behalf (if they think it is worth defending the claim).

                Regarding your Admiral policy, if it is a standard online policy can you post a link to it please so we can read the whole document in the original.
                We might need also to see the schedule

                Comment

                View our Terms and Conditions

                LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                Working...
                X