Dear Sir/Madam,
I am seeking help regarding Subjucrlt Access Request ("SAR"), which I submitted to my Housing Assosiation under the General Data Protection Regulations 2018, ("GDPR18")..
On the 18th of April 2023, I submitted my SAR's request to my Hoising Association for all documents pertaining to Servce Charges, which were unlawfully taken, dating back to when my tenancy started, 04 December 1995. I received a reply requesting for proof of identification, which I submitted on the 20th of April 2023.
On the 2nd of June 2023, i chased this up as I had heard nothing since the request for ID. I was informed that my request was not treated as a SAR's request, but instead its been treated as a Business as Usual request ("BAU").
Is this legal? What is a BAU? or are my landlord now in breach if the GDPR18.
I require this information as my landlord has alrrady admited liability by stating they never consulted me as stated they should have done in my tenancy. However, my landlord has only gone back 6 years. I intend to fight this in court with the hope of displacing the Limitations Act. I require the information to see how muge has been unlawfully taken.
Kind regards,
Stevieb
I am seeking help regarding Subjucrlt Access Request ("SAR"), which I submitted to my Housing Assosiation under the General Data Protection Regulations 2018, ("GDPR18")..
On the 18th of April 2023, I submitted my SAR's request to my Hoising Association for all documents pertaining to Servce Charges, which were unlawfully taken, dating back to when my tenancy started, 04 December 1995. I received a reply requesting for proof of identification, which I submitted on the 20th of April 2023.
On the 2nd of June 2023, i chased this up as I had heard nothing since the request for ID. I was informed that my request was not treated as a SAR's request, but instead its been treated as a Business as Usual request ("BAU").
Is this legal? What is a BAU? or are my landlord now in breach if the GDPR18.
I require this information as my landlord has alrrady admited liability by stating they never consulted me as stated they should have done in my tenancy. However, my landlord has only gone back 6 years. I intend to fight this in court with the hope of displacing the Limitations Act. I require the information to see how muge has been unlawfully taken.
Kind regards,
Stevieb
Comment