Hi
I live on a mixed development of mainly freehold properties and a few leasehold blocks. The freehold properties pay an annual estate charge for the maintenance of some landscaped areas. The charge is collected by a managing agent for the developer. Because the agent also collects the combined estate and service charge from the leasehold properties he has been sending the estate charge demands to freeholders together with the statutory notice of tenants rights and obligations (CLR 2002) that I believe should only be sent to leaseholders. As the notice content clearly has no relevance to the freeholders and it would seem the CLR Act only applies to leaseholders and their landlords, I asked the agent to stop sending them to freeholders as the content could be seen as quite threatening to a freeholder who might incorrectly believe someone could repossess their home if they defaulted on payment (The obligation to pay the estate charge by freeholders is by way of a deed signed on completion and not an estate rent charge).
Whilst accepting that the content of the notice did not in anyway apply to freeholders the agent maintained that the advice from his legal advisor was that he must by law send out the notice to freeholders too.
I would be very grateful if anyone could clarify this. Thanks in advance
I live on a mixed development of mainly freehold properties and a few leasehold blocks. The freehold properties pay an annual estate charge for the maintenance of some landscaped areas. The charge is collected by a managing agent for the developer. Because the agent also collects the combined estate and service charge from the leasehold properties he has been sending the estate charge demands to freeholders together with the statutory notice of tenants rights and obligations (CLR 2002) that I believe should only be sent to leaseholders. As the notice content clearly has no relevance to the freeholders and it would seem the CLR Act only applies to leaseholders and their landlords, I asked the agent to stop sending them to freeholders as the content could be seen as quite threatening to a freeholder who might incorrectly believe someone could repossess their home if they defaulted on payment (The obligation to pay the estate charge by freeholders is by way of a deed signed on completion and not an estate rent charge).
Whilst accepting that the content of the notice did not in anyway apply to freeholders the agent maintained that the advice from his legal advisor was that he must by law send out the notice to freeholders too.
I would be very grateful if anyone could clarify this. Thanks in advance
Comment