Hi, we have recently moved to a new home, which is a small private estate around 10 houses on a cul de sac. The road at the moment is owned by the company that built the estate and it was very much sold as a private estate. We have some shops at the front of the main road, just where our private road starts, that have access to the rear of their shops for delivery access, we like having the shops there however it's an ongoing issue of delivery drivers abusing access rights and the public using our estate as a parking lot. I have tried to speak to the company who built the houses and who still maintain ownership and upkeep of the road. My questions are:
First Question - We had requested a gate to be installed which would be push button access for all, so that the shops could maintain their deliveries but the estate gains the privacy it was sold on. This was rejected due to 3 out of the 10 houses saying they were against the gate due to costs. The company then said majority doesn't rule and that the 3 'nays' outweighs the 7 'yays' - is this correct?
Second question - We have asked for ownership of the road to be transferred to the residents, again they are saying every single house needs to agree to this, if 1 out of the 10 say no then it won't happen, again is this correct? The company who built and maintain don't make any profit so I'm sure would be ok with giving away ownership, as they have indicated.
Third question - Are there any banana skins in the transfer of ownership to be aware of? This one is a final thought, I'm sure the biggest question here, or the one that will need the most attention is the majority rules situation where the company are saying 1 'no' vs 9 'yes' equal 'no'.
Thanks in advance for any thoughts.
First Question - We had requested a gate to be installed which would be push button access for all, so that the shops could maintain their deliveries but the estate gains the privacy it was sold on. This was rejected due to 3 out of the 10 houses saying they were against the gate due to costs. The company then said majority doesn't rule and that the 3 'nays' outweighs the 7 'yays' - is this correct?
Second question - We have asked for ownership of the road to be transferred to the residents, again they are saying every single house needs to agree to this, if 1 out of the 10 say no then it won't happen, again is this correct? The company who built and maintain don't make any profit so I'm sure would be ok with giving away ownership, as they have indicated.
Third question - Are there any banana skins in the transfer of ownership to be aware of? This one is a final thought, I'm sure the biggest question here, or the one that will need the most attention is the majority rules situation where the company are saying 1 'no' vs 9 'yes' equal 'no'.
Thanks in advance for any thoughts.
Comment