• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Deed of gift problems

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Deed of gift problems

    Hi all,
    My wife and I are separating prior to divorce. My wife is moving out and renting as an agreement between us as she has a substantial house in her name which was gifted to her by her Father via deed of gift 6 years ago. Her 90 year old father still lives in the house tho who is fit and well. My wife will have to claim Universal Credit (UC) when she moves, but as it is means tested, she will be entitled to nothing because her father's house is in her name solely which is deemed a capital asset. When it was gifted to her, stupidly, there was no trust setup so her father could live there until his death. Is there anyway around this at all? My wife would never evict her dad and he doesn't want anyone living with him either, so she can't move in with him. It's all amicable between my wife and I, and we are try to sort this out together.
    Tags: None

  • #2
    In this particular case I believe the value of property can be disregarded as the property is occupied by a relative who is over Pension Credit qualifying age

    However before you start celebrating let me find the chapter and verse in the regulations to make sure I remember it correctly.
    Might take a day or so


    As an after thought will your wife not be assessed as owning a share of your current home?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by des8 View Post
      In this particular case I believe the value of property can be disregarded as the property is occupied by a relative who is over Pension Credit qualifying age

      However before you start celebrating let me find the chapter and verse in the regulations to make sure I remember it correctly.
      Might take a day or so


      As an after thought will your wife not be assessed as owning a share of your current home?
      Hi Des8,
      Thank you so much for reply. Is the disregard you refer to for persons claiming benefits who are over Pension Credit qualifying age themselves? I would be so grateful if you could prove me wrong, I sure hope I'm wrong and you are correct.
      Regarding my current home, I've been told that it would be disregarded for 26 weeks in the first instance, also as one of my son's (16 yrs and in education) it would be disregarded and also because I am disabled and incapacitated that it would disregarded, so I think we're pretty safe on that front.
      Thank you.

      Comment


      • #4
        The disregard refers to the occupier of the house being a close relative who is over PC qualifying age, not the claimant

        Regulations: https://assets.publishing.service.go...2331/admh2.pdf

        "Premises lived in by a close relative
        The law
        H2048 Premises that are occupied as the home by a close relative of a person are disregarded indefinitely where the close relative has
        1. LCW or
        2. reached the qualifying age for SPC1 . 1 UC Regs, Sch 10, para 2

        H2049 A close relative in relation to a person means1
        1. parent
        2.....

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by des8 View Post
          The disregard refers to the occupier of the house being a close relative who is over PC qualifying age, not the claimant

          Regulations: https://assets.publishing.service.go...2331/admh2.pdf

          "Premises lived in by a close relative
          The law
          H2048 Premises that are occupied as the home by a close relative of a person are disregarded indefinitely where the close relative has
          1. LCW or
          2. reached the qualifying age for SPC1 . 1 UC Regs, Sch 10, para 2

          H2049 A close relative in relation to a person means1
          1. parent
          2.....
          Hi Des8,
          Thank you so much for this, I am so happy that you have proved me wrong. That is great news! I know she has capital, but to kick someone out at that age (or any age really) is ludicrous. I have sent this to our benefits advisor as she wasn't sure as it crosses over into property. Much appreciated and have a great weekend !
          Best regards.

          Comment

          View our Terms and Conditions

          LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

          If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


          If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
          Working...
          X