• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Landlord and Deposit

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Landlord and Deposit

    We have just moved out of a property and did the check out with the landlord. At the point of check out, two issues were raised. One was an issue I pointed out where I had caused a small amount of damage with a cleaning product earlier that same day. The second was to reattached a curtain holdback that had come loose - we had already filled the holes, sanded, repainted and had the screws and rawl plugs there and then but the landlord said "nah, don't worry, I can do that" so we left it for him, gave him the keys and left the property. If it's at all relevant, it had only come loose because he'd used the wrong size screws in the first place and it was behind a door so when the door opened fully it bashed it, which weakened it over time. The only other thing that was mentioned was about some of his possessions that he had left in the property (ranging from curtains, lampshades, a rug, tools, ornaments, paperwork, DVDs, Christmas decorations etc) which we said we had moved into the attic. He knew that they'd been moved into the attic because he came by a couple of times during the tenancy to get some things and it had never been an issue for him.
    We did the check out a full day before the tenancy ended and had booked the next day off work so that we could correct, fix or clean anything he had an issue with but because he said he was happy with the place - we didn't come back. He did contact us the next morning because he'd spotted something we'd left behind, we responded saying we're happy to pick it up but also happy for him to just dispose of it but nothing else.
    After moving out, we tried to cancel the standing order for his rent payment but the bank said it takes five working days to cancel so the payment went through. We contacted him and explained and asked him to return it and he said he would. He then said he doesn't have online banking for that account. Then he said he can't get through on the phone lines so we still haven't received the money back. We requested our deposit back too.
    Then he emailed with a list of damage to the property - which wasn't mentioned at check out with the total damage at £12,000!! We asked him for receipts, quotes and photos - and he's sent a limited amount through. The invoice is for one company who have supposedly done all the cleaning, fixing and painting in the entire property.
    The invoice payee is the landlord's brother, who lives an hour and a half from the property. He's invoiced for forty hours of work. The next door neighbour said that the landlord did the work himself - not his brother and she knows this because he gained access through her property. She said the work was conducted over two days - so, unless he didn't sleep at all, he didn't do over forty hours of work. The company listed on the invoice isn't registered with Companies House and I can't find any record of anything to do with it anywhere online.
    The photos he has sent through, weren't taken at check out. The landlord came by around a month before our last day to do some repairs. These repairs have needed doing for the entire tenancy but he always found an excuse why he was busy, couldn't pay a handy-man and wouldn't let us do it ourselves. He didn't do any repairs or anything due to Covid until he wanted the issues fixed before viewings. The photos were taken during that visit to the property. We can prove that some of the photos were taken then because our possessions are in the background (and they obviously weren't in the property at check out). We can't prove all of these images were taken then though. The images relate to things like there being dog poo in the garden, marks on the walls, grease on the backsplash in the kitchen etc which was all cleaned before we moved out. The landlord has also taken pictures of the problems that he came to fix at that stage (which were recurring problems that he'd botched just before our tenancy and quickly broke again) and is charging us for those repairs!
    In his statement to us, he is claiming certain things were replaced at certain times - we can prove some of this is not true but not all of it. For example, he is claiming that the front garden fence and gate were new three years ago. But, they are clearly there on the Google street view maps archive in summer 2015 (and are visibly broken then). The neighbour has confirmed it was broken before we moved in as she discussed it with the previous tenant and a piece of it is in her front garden waiting for him to repair it.
    The major point of contention relates to the floors/doors. Before we took over the property, the landlord reattached two heavy, wooden, character doors to the hinges use polyfiller and short screws. One of the hinges was cracked. We have photos which show this. Very quickly, the doors began dragging on the floors - we informed the landlord of this and offered to fix it ourselves when he delayed repairs. As a results, the doors slightly damaged the floors and door frame from dragging and scraping. We stopped using them for a lot of the time but eventually one door fully came off the hinges - and stayed off until the landlord came to "fix" it before the viewing. By the time we checked out (just three weeks later, and we hadn't been living there full time), it was already dragging on the floor again because he didn't fix it properly. When we moved in, we pointed out damage to the front door caused by a dog - the landlord acknowledged it (face to face) and said not to worry about it. He came to repair that on the day just before the viewing so the damage was there the full duration of our tenancy but is not there now. The landlord is charging us for the damage to the doors (all three - the two with the dodgy hinges and the other with the dog damage even though he fixed it during our tenancy and it wasn't our fault). He's provided photos which purport to show them at the end of the tenancy but we have our own photos to show it was fixed by then. He's also charging us to sand and re-varnish the floors because of the damage from the doors. He is claiming that it cost over £6000 to do that last time (for two rooms around 4mx4m) - the neighbour said that last time, did sanded and varnished it himself, which is why it didn't last well all over.
    Our tenancy agreement states that we must get the windows professionally cleaned every two months. Due to Covid, we weren't able to get a professional window cleaner at the end of the tenancy (they were done about three months ago) so we cleaned them as best we could. The landlord is charging us for a professional window cleaning quote (three times what we paid when we've had them professionally cleaned) but said that, due to Covid, he can't get them cleaned either. Surely it's unfair for him to expect us to get something professionally cleaned when he is unable to get them professionally cleaned himself? Also, they were not professionally cleaned prior to us moving in.
    The landlord is also charging us for his time that he spent taking his own possessions out of the attic and removing the dust (from the attic) from them. Can he do this? The property was let unfurnished, it shouldn't have had any of his possessions in it in the first place. The tenancy agreement says we are not permitted to remove fixtures and fittings from the property but a) I don't think his personal possessions constitute fixtures/fittings and b) we didn't remove them from the property, we moved them within the property to somewhere out of our way.
    I'm at a loss for what to do. We took photos when we moved in but I lost my phone and the photos went with it. We do have some photos of things that we in the background of other things we were photographing (like the children or guests) in the first few weeks of our tenancy. From my standpoint, I'm happy to pay for the cleaning damage I caused on the last day and, at a push, for the screwing in of the curtain holdback (even though he said not to worry when we were stood there with a drill ready to do it). He's even charged us for screws and rawl plugs even though we provided those for it when we left! I don't think anything else he's requesting is fair or reasonable. When we checked into the property, we were given a sheet to tick to say the property was clean (not "professionally cleaned", it wasn't professionally cleaned), that the lighting, electricity, gas, plumbing etc were working. We didn't state anything to say about damage to the property or the condition it was in.
    I'm very aware that we have very limited evidence (just a few photos and not of everything). We also have messages and emails that confirm our version of events. We can prove some (but not all) of the photos were taken before we checked out.
    Do you think we have sufficient evidence to fight this? What should we do?
    Tags: None

  • #2
    the first questions which spring to mind are a) was the deposit in a scheme and have you received the correct notifications of this b) was there an entry inventory done and agreed?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by islandgirl View Post
      the first questions which spring to mind are a) was the deposit in a scheme and have you received the correct notifications of this b) was there an entry inventory done and agreed?
      Yes, the deposit is in a scheme and confirmed with them - but the accidental overpayment of rent went straight to his bank account and he still has that. There was no inventory at checkin or checkout. There was one sheet of paper that we ticked and signed to say that the house was clean (not professionally cleaned), the lighting worked, the gas worked, the electricity worked, the plumbing worked, the heating worked and that the walls and floors were "sound" and that the garden was "presentable". We also signed to say we had received keys.
      The wooden floors were a bit scratched and the carpets were a bit worn, the walls had some scuffs and had some holes that were polyfilled and not sanded/painted - some picture hooks and nails in the walls etc. But it was all "sound". We made a note about things like a leak but we'd not noticed much because it was immediately on arrival.
      There was no inventory though - no recording of any damage to the property at all, no mention of the landlord's possessions left there or anything like that.

      Comment


      • #4
        With no entry inventory how can the LL prove any damage when you leave? You will need to raise a dispute re the deposit detailing all the issues above. I am sure someone with more experience of the tenant's side of this will give you more advice. Does the deposit cover the value of the invoice - ie has the LL created the invoice to try to keep the deposit?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by islandgirl View Post
          With no entry inventory how can the LL prove any damage when you leave? You will need to raise a dispute re the deposit detailing all the issues above. I am sure someone with more experience of the tenant's side of this will give you more advice. Does the deposit cover the value of the invoice - ie has the LL created the invoice to try to keep the deposit?
          The invoice is for more than the deposit amount so he's trying to keep our whole deposit. We think that without an inventory he'll provide photos but he didn't take any photos at check in so I think he'll use images from a different time (either from many years prior or from after the work has been done now). The photos in the advert for when we found the property were the same as the ones he used for the next tenants when we moved out - and they were the same as the ones he used for the advert for the tenants before us as well. We can prove that some of his check out damage photos weren't taken at check out so I'm just hoping that being able to prove that will convince the TDS that the landlord's photos can't be trusted as genuine evidence of anything. We can also show the TDS that his invoice cannot be trusted because he's produced an invoice to him from someone else for work that the neighbour has confirmed she saw him doing himself - why would he ever be invoiced by someone else for work he has done!? If he'd been honest that he was doing the work and charged a reasonable rate for his own time then that might be considered fair but the fact he's lied about it indicates to me that he's trying it on.

          Comment


          • #6
            I don't have experience but from another forum I use I think the LL will struggle to keep the deposit. He may try to sue you for the money but without proof of condition as I understand it he is unlikely to succeed. The matter will take some time and will go to an adjudicator. The additional amount on top of the deposit may be a ploy to frighten you into signing over the whole deposit to him. Have a look at the Landlordzone forum.

            Comment

            View our Terms and Conditions

            LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

            If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


            If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
            Working...
            X