Re: Crack House Closure
I am exhausted!!
Just got back from court.
Their solicitor was held up so we didn't start until around 12.
We had letter's to show lies and witness satements to lies being told.
Earlier in the week, amoung other papers, the HA gave my daughter a statement written by the neighbour about the £3000 of heroin. Names had been blacked out naturally. This is a quote from it.
"Kya's sister told Ann when the police searched her flat they thrown it out of the back window. Later when the police left Kya and Ricky went in to the back garden to find it street value of £3000 uncut pure heroin."
They left Ann's name in it!!!!
Ann totally denied any of this, was really angry and has written a statement denying it all.
My other daughter is furious as she has not said any of this either. And made a statement saying this.
I would also like to say that it wasn't true! She has never used heroin. Why the neighbour said such a large quantity, making it totally unbelievable I don't know.
And I find the phrase 'uncut pure heroin' quite strange. Where on earth would anyone get that?
Anyway, their solicitor said that if my daughter agreed to the injunction, they would agree to it not starting until 15/10/07, but if she did fight it they would ask for it to have emmediate effect and a larger area.
So, in light of all the decisions so far going against her she agreed.
This way she has plenty of time to move out to the new place.
Then on the 15th she can appeal the injunction and make it clear why she agreed in the first place.
No court costs given to her either.
Although the statements weren't used, the HA woman asked for copies of them, so hopefully there will be some come back to the neighbour.
Now we have the appeal to the closure, which is kind of pointless as it's gone, but it would be good to get it removed from her name. Also, the coucil did not pay the rent while she was not there as they needed to pay the hostel. The HA want the 2 months rent from my daughter. If we can prove the closure was wrongly given then maybe she won't be liable for the rent.
sally x
I am exhausted!!
Just got back from court.
Their solicitor was held up so we didn't start until around 12.
We had letter's to show lies and witness satements to lies being told.
Earlier in the week, amoung other papers, the HA gave my daughter a statement written by the neighbour about the £3000 of heroin. Names had been blacked out naturally. This is a quote from it.
"Kya's sister told Ann when the police searched her flat they thrown it out of the back window. Later when the police left Kya and Ricky went in to the back garden to find it street value of £3000 uncut pure heroin."
They left Ann's name in it!!!!
Ann totally denied any of this, was really angry and has written a statement denying it all.
My other daughter is furious as she has not said any of this either. And made a statement saying this.
I would also like to say that it wasn't true! She has never used heroin. Why the neighbour said such a large quantity, making it totally unbelievable I don't know.
And I find the phrase 'uncut pure heroin' quite strange. Where on earth would anyone get that?
Anyway, their solicitor said that if my daughter agreed to the injunction, they would agree to it not starting until 15/10/07, but if she did fight it they would ask for it to have emmediate effect and a larger area.
So, in light of all the decisions so far going against her she agreed.
This way she has plenty of time to move out to the new place.
Then on the 15th she can appeal the injunction and make it clear why she agreed in the first place.
No court costs given to her either.
Although the statements weren't used, the HA woman asked for copies of them, so hopefully there will be some come back to the neighbour.
Now we have the appeal to the closure, which is kind of pointless as it's gone, but it would be good to get it removed from her name. Also, the coucil did not pay the rent while she was not there as they needed to pay the hostel. The HA want the 2 months rent from my daughter. If we can prove the closure was wrongly given then maybe she won't be liable for the rent.
sally x
Comment