Hi there.
We have lived on a new build estate for the past 2 years and all has been well (except for a slightly eager Management Company getting involved in everyone's day to day business)..
Recently we received a letter from the Management Company that look after our estate asking people who live here to stop trespassing on the driveways of our fellow neighbours.
It turns out that some of the roadways on the estate are shared driveways between properties - and therefore private property between those houses, fair enough.. The developer had at no point informed purchasers that those areas were private (and they can be used as a shortcut around the estate - hence people using them)
These private driveways are unadopted by the council (obviously) and have lighting, the electricity for which is paid equally by all residents on the estate in our service charges.
My question is is this fair and is this correct? Our transfer states that the management company covenants "To keep the Common Parts properly lit as the Management Company in the interests of good estate management deem appropriate"
It seems unfair that all the residents are paying to - in essence - provide lighting for these (exclusive) property's driveways..
Is this correct? Thoughts?
Many thanks,
Dan
We have lived on a new build estate for the past 2 years and all has been well (except for a slightly eager Management Company getting involved in everyone's day to day business)..
Recently we received a letter from the Management Company that look after our estate asking people who live here to stop trespassing on the driveways of our fellow neighbours.
It turns out that some of the roadways on the estate are shared driveways between properties - and therefore private property between those houses, fair enough.. The developer had at no point informed purchasers that those areas were private (and they can be used as a shortcut around the estate - hence people using them)
These private driveways are unadopted by the council (obviously) and have lighting, the electricity for which is paid equally by all residents on the estate in our service charges.
My question is is this fair and is this correct? Our transfer states that the management company covenants "To keep the Common Parts properly lit as the Management Company in the interests of good estate management deem appropriate"
It seems unfair that all the residents are paying to - in essence - provide lighting for these (exclusive) property's driveways..
Is this correct? Thoughts?
Many thanks,
Dan
Comment