Tweet
The person involved owns a property. This was rented out to another. The landlord lives in a caravan and strictly speaking is NFA, but uses the address. Action is taken initially against the tenant who claimed HB and CT relief. The tenant wins at tribunal establishing that the landlord did not reside at the address. The tenant (via HB) has paid the CT for every year. The council then seeks back CT from the landlord with the argument "We have no record of you living at any other address, you must therefore owe us CT." The person has written to the council telling them the facts, but the reply was the above argument. Help Please. (I was the tenant) CT was paid by HB.
Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
REGISTER
Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.
Working...