Hi,
I have a problem with a surveyor firm who have changed their address to stall the enforcement process. The firm operates under a limited company. My contract was with the firm, and this firm is both registered and still operating.
HCEO's turned up to find that the firms registered address was vacant, and only by chance were informed of the new address close-by.
I am concerned that upon going to the new address (HCEOs had to ask my permission for them to attend the new address) the director of the company may claim that the firm is not at the new address.
I should clarify that the defendant has NOT notified me or the courts of the new address - i.e. even with a judgement against them they have simply "moved out" without informing the courts or myself.
So if the defendant tries to claim that the firm does not reside at the new address, then surely this means the firm has NO business address. This doesn't sound right to me. All businesses, including firms, must have a business address as a prerequisite for operating as far as I know.
Would such an enforcement evasion tactic actually work? Surely it's not that easy to escape judgement???
I have a problem with a surveyor firm who have changed their address to stall the enforcement process. The firm operates under a limited company. My contract was with the firm, and this firm is both registered and still operating.
HCEO's turned up to find that the firms registered address was vacant, and only by chance were informed of the new address close-by.
I am concerned that upon going to the new address (HCEOs had to ask my permission for them to attend the new address) the director of the company may claim that the firm is not at the new address.
I should clarify that the defendant has NOT notified me or the courts of the new address - i.e. even with a judgement against them they have simply "moved out" without informing the courts or myself.
So if the defendant tries to claim that the firm does not reside at the new address, then surely this means the firm has NO business address. This doesn't sound right to me. All businesses, including firms, must have a business address as a prerequisite for operating as far as I know.
Would such an enforcement evasion tactic actually work? Surely it's not that easy to escape judgement???
Comment