6 days ago My youngest son was questioned under caution by 2 officers at my house. The circumstances of which are that allegedly he drove away from the scene of an accident.
This occurred whilst he was at the BP garage, the Police say that he reversed into a People carrier, by their admission this was at walking pace, the police confirmed that there is no damage to our vehicle and they also said there was a minor dent in the vehicle of person making the complaint.
My Son says he was reversing as he realised that the petrol cap was on the wrong side of the car to the pump, he didn't feel that he hit anything and stopped when the other party beeped his horn, he drove off as there were no other free pumps, waving an apology to the person behind.
The Police attempted throughout the interview to get him to change his story stating they had witness statements (probably from any passengers in the car) and the video tape from the garage which they say shows him putting his hands to his face as if in shock, he maintained he did not feel any contact and that he braked when the other person sounded his horn and slapped his head due to his stupidity in not seeing the other driver
Apart from some technical offences with the car which he's admitted to and is prepared to answer for, my concern is that they are adding 'driving without due care' and 'leaving the scene' which when you look at the circumstances, if proven, may be technically correct however practically there was minor damage and the accident occurred at in the other parties words at 'walking pace'.
He maintains that he left because there were no free pumps, he didn't get out of the car because he didn't want to get into conflict with the other person and also he has only been driving for 6mths by his admission he freaked a little at the near miss as he saw it.
If he is summonsed under those circumstances I'm worried that the judge will only look at the offence and not the circumstances surrounding the event, also if he is convicted all that will appear on his record will be the offences not that this was a minor bump by an inexperienced driver.
Can I apply to see the evidence against my son so I can judge the seriousness (I believe my lad but you never know as he freaked and it perhaps got jumbled in his head), can we offer to have the other persons car repaired at our expense if the charges of 'leaving and due care' are dropped if so to both of the above, how do I approach the authorities to get these things done.
This is the first time he (or any of my kids) has had any truck with the police, potentially my son stands to lose his license if he gets 6 points (under the new drivers act), this will make it even harder for him to get an apprenticeship as a mechanic, I'd appreciate any advice.
This occurred whilst he was at the BP garage, the Police say that he reversed into a People carrier, by their admission this was at walking pace, the police confirmed that there is no damage to our vehicle and they also said there was a minor dent in the vehicle of person making the complaint.
My Son says he was reversing as he realised that the petrol cap was on the wrong side of the car to the pump, he didn't feel that he hit anything and stopped when the other party beeped his horn, he drove off as there were no other free pumps, waving an apology to the person behind.
The Police attempted throughout the interview to get him to change his story stating they had witness statements (probably from any passengers in the car) and the video tape from the garage which they say shows him putting his hands to his face as if in shock, he maintained he did not feel any contact and that he braked when the other person sounded his horn and slapped his head due to his stupidity in not seeing the other driver
Apart from some technical offences with the car which he's admitted to and is prepared to answer for, my concern is that they are adding 'driving without due care' and 'leaving the scene' which when you look at the circumstances, if proven, may be technically correct however practically there was minor damage and the accident occurred at in the other parties words at 'walking pace'.
He maintains that he left because there were no free pumps, he didn't get out of the car because he didn't want to get into conflict with the other person and also he has only been driving for 6mths by his admission he freaked a little at the near miss as he saw it.
If he is summonsed under those circumstances I'm worried that the judge will only look at the offence and not the circumstances surrounding the event, also if he is convicted all that will appear on his record will be the offences not that this was a minor bump by an inexperienced driver.
Can I apply to see the evidence against my son so I can judge the seriousness (I believe my lad but you never know as he freaked and it perhaps got jumbled in his head), can we offer to have the other persons car repaired at our expense if the charges of 'leaving and due care' are dropped if so to both of the above, how do I approach the authorities to get these things done.
This is the first time he (or any of my kids) has had any truck with the police, potentially my son stands to lose his license if he gets 6 points (under the new drivers act), this will make it even harder for him to get an apprenticeship as a mechanic, I'd appreciate any advice.
Comment