• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Received N244 - but it's not sealed...

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Received N244 - but it's not sealed...

    Hi, we've recently issued a CPR Part 8 claim. The Defendant has acknowledged service and applied for an extension of time to provide her evidence in response to our claim.

    Instead of filing a defence she has served an N244 - Application to Strike Out.

    This was sent out by her solicitors and not been sealed by the court. Does this mean it is invalid?

  • #2
    Re: Received N244 - but it's not sealed...

    Nope its usual for solicitors to send unsealed copy to claimant/defendant as well as submitting to the court - polite protocols etc. I'd give it a couple days and call the court and see if it has been submitted to the court. I Wouldnt respond to it till you have confirmation it has been entered.

    what is the strike out application based on ?
    #staysafestayhome

    Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

    Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Received N244 - but it's not sealed...

      Apparently they submitted 3 copies to the court in mid September (excuse me for being a bit non-specific but let's just say between 15-20th).

      There has since been a hearing (as that had already been scheduled when she applied for more time to file her evidence).

      We have STILL not received the stamped copy from the court... though have been ordered to respond to it...

      The strike out is on the grounds that THEY say it shouldn't be heard because THEY say we haven't got any chance of winning (though they don't put any evidence...) and it's an abuse of process. THEY always make these types of assertions "it happened because that's what we say happened...". It's a long-running saga.

      Comment

      View our Terms and Conditions

      LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

      If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


      If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
      Working...
      X