Tweet
Court Audio recordings & transcripts
I have four questions relating to court audio recordings & transcripts.
1. Can someone give me an example of case law where someone successfully applied to listen to a court audio recording in civil county court England and Wales where they were a party to a case and have already received the transcript after submitting an EX107 from?
2. Is there a standard chain of custody for audio recordings throughout the county courts? By that I mean what checks and balances are there to ensure that when an audio recording is made that is then secure to prevent someone from deleting, altering the audio recordings? Are there duplicates to ensure the safety of the recordings?
3. Is there any case law available where a party who has had a transcript has challenged the authenticity of the audio and had it forensically checked?
4. I recently learned that a Judge can alter the transcript of his/her words after giving an oral judgement and before they draw down the sealed order, however if a court audio recording of proceedings other than this oral judgement amendment was changed, for instance during a hearing for a time extension or a remedies hearing, i.e any hearing other than a judgement and words changed of the witnesses in a civil case would that be malpractice in a public office?
1. Can someone give me an example of case law where someone successfully applied to listen to a court audio recording in civil county court England and Wales where they were a party to a case and have already received the transcript after submitting an EX107 from?
2. Is there a standard chain of custody for audio recordings throughout the county courts? By that I mean what checks and balances are there to ensure that when an audio recording is made that is then secure to prevent someone from deleting, altering the audio recordings? Are there duplicates to ensure the safety of the recordings?
3. Is there any case law available where a party who has had a transcript has challenged the authenticity of the audio and had it forensically checked?
4. I recently learned that a Judge can alter the transcript of his/her words after giving an oral judgement and before they draw down the sealed order, however if a court audio recording of proceedings other than this oral judgement amendment was changed, for instance during a hearing for a time extension or a remedies hearing, i.e any hearing other than a judgement and words changed of the witnesses in a civil case would that be malpractice in a public office?
Comment