• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Planning Law - are 'conditions' enforceable?

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Planning Law - are 'conditions' enforceable?





    I am interested to know whether or not the documents included in a planning application, that set out the parking rights, are legally enforceable or not?
    Looking at the documents from the initial planning application, through to the granting of consent, there are many references that detail parking arrangements. The final planning consent was given with several ‘conditions’. One such condition was that a parking plan was submitted and approved before works started on the development. This condition was duly discharged.

    The documented parking plan states there will be off-road car parking spaces available for a 'community building' with these being shared with adjoining office building. The nature of the two uses means that peak parking demand for one does not overlap with the other and it also states that the spaces should not be abused for residential parking.

    The management company currently overseeing the site advise these parking plans have no legal standing and suggest residents may now make use of some of the spaces.

    Do these 'conditions' of planning consent stand after a development is finished - do they have to be adhered to or is a developer allowed to disregard them once they’ve achieved their aim of gaining planning permission? Who would we go to to enforce them?

    Tags: None

  • #2
    YOUR LAST PARAGRAPH
    Q1) No
    Q2) The relevant council who granted the application.

    See https://www.womblebonddickinson.com/...-supreme-court

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by efpom View Post
      YOUR LAST PARAGRAPH
      Q1) No
      Q2) The relevant council who granted the application.

      See https://www.womblebonddickinson.com/...-supreme-court
      Thank you for that - and interesting reading.

      Comment


      • #4
        Creo que esta lectura puede ser de ayuda para mí

        Comment

        View our Terms and Conditions

        LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

        If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


        If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
        Working...
        X