Tweet
This is all in relation to correspondence my opponent has written.
Without prejudice correspondence:
1. If this contains threats can it be made admissible?
2. If this contains information not related to negotiating a settlement can I refer to that information in open correspondence?
Open correspondence:
3. Do I need to respond to every false allegation made in open correspondence written before action? Can any adverse inference be made during proceedings if I don't?
4. Do I need to correct misrepresentations of facts/events/things they or I have supposed to have said? Can any adverse inference be made if I don't correct it?
Without prejudice correspondence:
1. If this contains threats can it be made admissible?
2. If this contains information not related to negotiating a settlement can I refer to that information in open correspondence?
Open correspondence:
3. Do I need to respond to every false allegation made in open correspondence written before action? Can any adverse inference be made during proceedings if I don't?
4. Do I need to correct misrepresentations of facts/events/things they or I have supposed to have said? Can any adverse inference be made if I don't correct it?
