Tweet
http://Briggs & Ors v Clay & Ors [2019] EWHC 102 (Ch) (25 February 2019)
The High Court has held that the content of “without prejudice” (“WP”) communications between the parties to the proceedings was inadmissible, though the fact of the WP negotiations could be referred to.
The counterparty to the WP communications would be prejudiced by admission of the communications, and it had neither deployed the content of the WP communications nor put in issue matters which were only justiciable by reference to them
(more - https://hsfnotes.com/litigation/2019...rejudice-rule/ )
The High Court has held that the content of “without prejudice” (“WP”) communications between the parties to the proceedings was inadmissible, though the fact of the WP negotiations could be referred to.
The counterparty to the WP communications would be prejudiced by admission of the communications, and it had neither deployed the content of the WP communications nor put in issue matters which were only justiciable by reference to them
(more - https://hsfnotes.com/litigation/2019...rejudice-rule/ )
