Hi there,
Secondary to my post earlier, I have a further question.
I am acting as the executor of my father's estate (Scotland). Long story short; funds were removed from my father's bank account a couple of days after his death. The person who has removed the funds (let's call them person A) has agreed to pay back 80% of what they removed. They believe that my father was indebted to them, equalling around 20% of what they removed, and are looking to keep this - I agree that this would be reasonable.
The disagreement comes from a family member (let's call them person B) who would like to continue to pursue for the full amount, even though this would be contrary to our interests, as the costs involved in doing so would far exceed the 20% not being paid back, although person B is driven almost wholly by vengeance against person A, despite further pursuit being impractical.
Also, person B is my sister (and, obviously, not the executor).
So, my questions:
1) Am I, the executor, fully responsible for accepting the offer from the 3rd party? Would this need the family member's consent? Can I simply accept this offer to tie up my father's estate from person A, without considering the opinion of person B?
2) In the settlement letter from the lawyer of person A offering to pay back 80%, both myself and person B are named as the other party. Why would this be the case if I'm the executor?
3) If the answer to 1) is that I *would* require person B's consent, I would not wish to be involved in racking up costs for such a legal case, and as such would no longer wish to continue as executor. How can I go about passing this on to the family member?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks.
Secondary to my post earlier, I have a further question.
I am acting as the executor of my father's estate (Scotland). Long story short; funds were removed from my father's bank account a couple of days after his death. The person who has removed the funds (let's call them person A) has agreed to pay back 80% of what they removed. They believe that my father was indebted to them, equalling around 20% of what they removed, and are looking to keep this - I agree that this would be reasonable.
The disagreement comes from a family member (let's call them person B) who would like to continue to pursue for the full amount, even though this would be contrary to our interests, as the costs involved in doing so would far exceed the 20% not being paid back, although person B is driven almost wholly by vengeance against person A, despite further pursuit being impractical.
Also, person B is my sister (and, obviously, not the executor).
So, my questions:
1) Am I, the executor, fully responsible for accepting the offer from the 3rd party? Would this need the family member's consent? Can I simply accept this offer to tie up my father's estate from person A, without considering the opinion of person B?
2) In the settlement letter from the lawyer of person A offering to pay back 80%, both myself and person B are named as the other party. Why would this be the case if I'm the executor?
3) If the answer to 1) is that I *would* require person B's consent, I would not wish to be involved in racking up costs for such a legal case, and as such would no longer wish to continue as executor. How can I go about passing this on to the family member?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks.
Comment