I've been involved in my company's grievance process now for 6 months, and am just entering the appeal stage.
The original hearing was a sham, which I appealed, the director of ethics and compliance of the business's parent company ordered my grievance to be fully reheard after investigating it himself and due to the evidence I'd provided.
In the second hearing, the evidence is absolutely overwhelming in support of what I'm saying is true, yet my grievance has been rejected again, this time on grounds that actually beggar belief.
Basically the business are disregarding all evidence I've provided and choosing to not uphold my grievance due to the statements of managers involved, even though they differ from the statements they gave in the first hearing dramatically.
Is this common practice for employers to rarely uphold an employee's grievance? And if so why?
thanks
The original hearing was a sham, which I appealed, the director of ethics and compliance of the business's parent company ordered my grievance to be fully reheard after investigating it himself and due to the evidence I'd provided.
In the second hearing, the evidence is absolutely overwhelming in support of what I'm saying is true, yet my grievance has been rejected again, this time on grounds that actually beggar belief.
Basically the business are disregarding all evidence I've provided and choosing to not uphold my grievance due to the statements of managers involved, even though they differ from the statements they gave in the first hearing dramatically.
Is this common practice for employers to rarely uphold an employee's grievance? And if so why?
thanks
Comment