Dear Forum members,
i am in a unique and tricky situation.
i have come a long way in my problems with my employers. they launched investigations and made numerous allegations of gross misconduct (nothing of nature of fraud etc.) . They have now completed the investigations and have gathered enough material that they can dismiss me. However, I raised grievances about the process, which was partially upheld. i then appealed and my appeal has been upheld. the employer is now saying that the investigation was biased and they now are proposing to re-investigate the matter, merely by getting a review of the evidence available to them, from an independent person.
my questions are:
1. Should I resign at this stage, taking the stand that they have now accepted that investigations were flawed and biased; and that any fresh review of the available evidence is unlikely to lead to a fair outcome; as it cannot remove the bias?
2. Should I accept their proposal and cooperate further with the matter and face disciplinary, if they decide to do so?
just for clarity, i am able to work via agencies, so am currently not too concerned about getting a reference, although would prefer a clean record for any future proper employment.
thanks
i am in a unique and tricky situation.
i have come a long way in my problems with my employers. they launched investigations and made numerous allegations of gross misconduct (nothing of nature of fraud etc.) . They have now completed the investigations and have gathered enough material that they can dismiss me. However, I raised grievances about the process, which was partially upheld. i then appealed and my appeal has been upheld. the employer is now saying that the investigation was biased and they now are proposing to re-investigate the matter, merely by getting a review of the evidence available to them, from an independent person.
my questions are:
1. Should I resign at this stage, taking the stand that they have now accepted that investigations were flawed and biased; and that any fresh review of the available evidence is unlikely to lead to a fair outcome; as it cannot remove the bias?
2. Should I accept their proposal and cooperate further with the matter and face disciplinary, if they decide to do so?
just for clarity, i am able to work via agencies, so am currently not too concerned about getting a reference, although would prefer a clean record for any future proper employment.
thanks
Comment