Re: Disciplinary meeting next week .
Very big no- no! It could be a criminal act in a government building / department.
Just make sure that the person accompanying is making lots of notes. For a tribunal - if that is where it is heading- they would accept the validity of notes as being as accurate as the employers, if you see what I mean.
Covert recording is something I don't recommend, but as a general principle the transcripts ( not the recordings themselves) may be advertised by a court. That's for the court to decide. But "bugging" ( recording when your are personally absent) is a very different matter. I know of only one instance where a recording was permitted when the person had left the room, and in that case the recording was not covert (the device was in the table, the panel knew about it, and forgot!) - and even then, the tribunal only accepted it because of public interest considerations. That was upheld at EAT.
Very big no- no! It could be a criminal act in a government building / department.
Just make sure that the person accompanying is making lots of notes. For a tribunal - if that is where it is heading- they would accept the validity of notes as being as accurate as the employers, if you see what I mean.
Covert recording is something I don't recommend, but as a general principle the transcripts ( not the recordings themselves) may be advertised by a court. That's for the court to decide. But "bugging" ( recording when your are personally absent) is a very different matter. I know of only one instance where a recording was permitted when the person had left the room, and in that case the recording was not covert (the device was in the table, the panel knew about it, and forgot!) - and even then, the tribunal only accepted it because of public interest considerations. That was upheld at EAT.
Comment