• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.
  • If you need direct help with your employment issue you can contact us at admin@legalbeaglesgroup.com for further assistance. This will give you access to “off-forum” support on a one-to- one basis from an experienced employment law expert for which we would welcome that you make a donation to help towards their time spent assisting on your matter. You can do this by clicking on the donate button in the box below.

Dismissal After Trial/Probationary Period

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dismissal After Trial/Probationary Period

    Hello,

    I was wondering whether anyone could be so kind to clarify my standing regarding my dismissal on Friday 13th November.

    I recently raised a Health & Safety Issue within the company on Wednesday 11th November, and provided my boss with adequate evidence to clarify there was an issue. However, this lead to a meeting being called with my boss and supervisor. There was a colleague there taking notes, and I did received a copy of the notes (albeit heavily edited).

    Two days after this meeting, I was pulled back into the office and was told that my standard of work isn't up to the companies', and accordingly I was being dismissed. I had no previous verbal, written or final warnings.

    Now, I was offered employment on the 1st of September with a 2 month Trial/Probationary period. I was dismissed on the 13th of November, which is outside of the Trial/Probationary window.

    During my Trial/Probationary period ending, and the meeting, there was no discussion about contract meetings, and I was asked to come in each day as normal, and complete my usual day-to-day tasks. I assumed that this meant an implied contract was in place, and that I was now a fully fledged member of the team, and therefore if I was to be dismissed, the correct procedures should be used (Disciplinary etc).

    The main aspects of the issue I would like clarification on are as follows;

    1. Has the company breached contract by dismissing me outside of my probationary period without following the disciplinary procedure?

    2. Even though the letter of dismissal letter doesn't mention the H&S issue I raised, could/would it be assumed that these events are linked? (Our professional relationship was satisfactory until that point).

    3. Are there any further actions I can take?

    What would be my next steps? I'm clearly frustrated as I did enjoy the job, and did enjoy working with the team. It just so appears in this case they wanted to get rid of me ASAP.

    Would copies of letters and documentation be of use?

    Kind Regards,

    Jamie.
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: Dismissal After Trial/Probationary Period

    Complaints that count as whistleblowing

    You’re protected by law if you report any of the following:
    • a criminal offence, eg fraud
    • someone’s health and safety is in danger
    • risk or actual damage to the environment
    • a miscarriage of justice
    • the company is breaking the law, eg doesn’t have the right insurance
    • you believe someone is covering up wrongdoing


    https://www.gov.uk/whistleblowing/wh...-whistleblower
    Don't let them grind you down

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Dismissal After Trial/Probationary Period

      This may not qualify as whistleblowing - it depends on the nature of the issue you reported and your reasons for reporting it. If you can tell us a bit more that would be helpful.

      Even if this doesn't qualify as whistleblowing, your dismissal may be automatically unfair if you can demonstrate it was because of the health and safety issue you reported. TBH this is often very difficult to demonstrate.

      Presumably you have been employed for fewer than two years? If your employer's dismissal procedure forms part of your contract, and that procedure wasn't followed, you will have a claim for wrongful dismissal/breach of contract.
      Disclaimer: I am not a qualified solicitor. Nothing provided herein should be used as a substitute for professional legal advice. As legal advice must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case, and laws are constantly changing, you should seek professional legal advice before acting upon any opinion, advice or information provided herein.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Dismissal After Trial/Probationary Period

        Hi Vanman & Matt,

        Many thanks for your replies.

        Matt,

        I reported a Health and Safety issue where the vans were being overloaded, and to an extent where there could be serious implications to employees and the public. Upon presenting the weighbridge ticket to my manager, I was pulled into a meeting room. The notes do vary quite a bit from what took place, and they were only presented to me on the Friday at the beginning of my dismisal meeting.

        Please see attached copies of the letters, along with a copy of the weighbridge ticket.

        What do you think?
        Attached Files

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Dismissal After Trial/Probationary Period

          I think it could be considered whistleblowing because there is a public interest element. Even if this wasn't the case, the date of your health and safety meeting, and your dismissal are too close together to likely be a coincidence.

          I think you do have the basis for an unfair dismissal case, and personally I would pursue it because it annoys me when employers try to get one over on their employees; however, you have to consider the expense and hassle of bringing a claim, and what you're likely to get out of it. Perhaps speak with an employment solicitor to find out what the likely outcome would be.
          Disclaimer: I am not a qualified solicitor. Nothing provided herein should be used as a substitute for professional legal advice. As legal advice must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case, and laws are constantly changing, you should seek professional legal advice before acting upon any opinion, advice or information provided herein.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Dismissal After Trial/Probationary Period

            The problem with this is how the health and safety issue was raised

            Was it an informal comment/ observation or was it an actual protected disclosure?
            Protected disclosures are for only serious health and safety violations or criminal activity

            I agree with Matt that it is to much of a coincidence but in reality it would seem there is not a lot you can do if they are using capability as an excuse within the 24 month period

            I feel only a Tribunal can decide that but i personally am not that optimistic of a positve result myself if you go down that road

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Dismissal After Trial/Probationary Period

              ok in my opinion its looks like they dismiss you because you reported the health and safety issue .
              after you had told the manager on the 11th that your vehicle was overweight
              then and only then they ask you into a meeting and supplied you with the notes setting out the reason for meeting ( YOU HAVE THE PROOF ON THE NOTES )
              which points out that you had weighed your van and it was overloaded.

              then on the 13th they dismissed you

              3 Complaints that stand out count as whistleblowing
              • a criminal offence, eg fraud
              • someone’s health and safety is in danger
              • risk or actual damage to the environment


              An overloaded vehicle will not only cause damage to roads and to your vehicle but will
              also put your drivers and other road users at risk. Overloading a vehicle:
              Makes the vehicle less stable, difficult to steer and take longer to stop.


              Vehicles react differently when the maximum weights which they are designed to carry are exceeded.
              The consequences can be fatal;

              Puts massive strain on vehicle tyres.

              Overloading can cause the tyres to overheat and wear rapidly which increases the chance of premature, dangerous and expensive failure (such as blow outs);

              it Means insurance cover is void.
              Overloading a vehicle is illegal and therefore
              insurance cover can be void if the vehicle is involved in a crash;

              Responsibility, legislation and guidelines

              Ensuring a vehicle is not overloaded is the responsibility of both the operator and the driver. In addition to this, if anyone else causes or permits an overloaded vehicle they may also be charged with committing an offence.

              All companies have a ‘duty of care’ under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1999 for the safety of employees at work. If someone is driving on your behalf, they are as much ‘at work’ as if they were in a factory or an office. This means that an employer must do all they can to ensure the safety of that driver,
              including having policies in place to ensure that their vehicle is not overloaded. The Act also places a duty of care on the employer to carry out suitable risk assessments.
              The operator has a moral and legal responsibility which is shared with the driver of the vehicle.

              The Road Traffic Act 1988
              requires “vehicle users” to ensure that vehicles are not overloaded.
              If a vehicle is found to be overloaded both the driver and operator could be prosecuted or cautioned.Legislation imposes fines of up to Ł5,000 for each offence
              That means a fine for each overloaded axle plus any overloading on the total weight.
              Also, if a vehicle is dangerously overloaded the driver could face a charge of Dangerous Driving which carries a maximum penalty of two years in prison. Other offences within the Road Traffic Act include refusal to allow the vehicle to be weighed and obstruction of an officer which also carry a maximum fine of Ł5,000. If a vehicle is overloaded and results in someone being killed,both driver and operator could face going to jail for Manslaughter or Death by Dangerous Driving.

              http://www.transportsfriend.org/road/loads/over.html

              Don't let them grind you down

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Dismissal After Trial/Probationary Period

                People are still missing the point

                If as an employee you have a health and safety concern you first raise it with the employer

                A protected disclosure is if you then take that complaInt to outside enforcement agencies such as the HSE, Gas Safe, Enviromental Health etc and suffer detriment by your employer because of it

                That has not happened in this case as the complaint was only raised with the employer

                This will be covered under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999

                You can refuse an instruction from your employer under section 100 Employment Rights Act 1998 with health and safety issues
                Last edited by judgemental24; 16th November 2015, 22:20:PM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Dismissal After Trial/Probationary Period

                  Originally posted by judgemental24 View Post
                  People are still missing the point

                  If as an employee you have a health and safety concern you first raise it with the employer (he did then got the sack )

                  A protected disclosure is if you then take that complant to outside enforcement agencies such as the HSE, Gas Safe, Enviromental Health etc

                  That has not happened in this case as the complaint was only raised with the employer
                  Sorry you haven't read the link properly
                  . What is a whistleblower

                  You’re a whistleblower if you’re a worker and you report certain types of wrongdoing. This will usually be something you’ve seen at work - though not always.
                  The wrongdoing you disclose must be in the public interest. This means it must affect others, eg the general public.
                  An overloaded vehicle will not only cause damage to roads and to your vehicle but will
                  also put your drivers and other road users at risk.
                  (general public)


                  You’re protected if you’re a worker, eg means example such as a police officer, NHS employee, office worker, factory worker
                  Don't let them grind you down

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Dismissal After Trial/Probationary Period

                    I myself am NEBOSH registered and hold a Diploma in Occupational health and safety in the work place

                    Not to mention an Area health and Safety rep for 20 years for a national trade union

                    What the law states and what you think the law states are totally opposite

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Dismissal After Trial/Probationary Period

                      Originally posted by judgemental24 View Post
                      I myself am NEBOSH registered and hold a Diploma in Occupational health and safety in the work place

                      Not to mention an Area health and Safety rep for 20 years for a national trade union

                      What the law states and what you think the law states are totally opposite
                      do you know anything about driving laws
                      ok what in your opinion what did go on here
                      Don't let them grind you down

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Dismissal After Trial/Probationary Period

                        Yes i am of the opinion by raising the issue with the employer he has been labled as a troublemaker and they are using capability as a reason to get rid of him

                        Driving laws??

                        Is that HGV, LGV, British Domestic Driving Hours??
                        7.5 Tonne, 17.5 Tonne and above??
                        Fixed static cab?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Dismissal After Trial/Probationary Period

                          In an attempt to calm an incipient "incident" here's what ACAS have to say about "Whistle blowing Public interest disclosure"
                          http://www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=1
                          • [*=left]Disclosures should be made in the public interest.
                            [*=left]If workers can not go to their employer with the disclosure first they should contact a prescribed person or body (guidance is available from GOV.UK - Blowing the whistle: list of prescribed people and bodies).
                            [*=left]If workers are dismissed because of whistleblowing they may claim unfair dismissal.
                            [*=left]A tribunal will have the power to reduce any compensation by up to 25% if they think the disclosure was made in "bad faith".

                          If workers bring information about a wrongdoing to the attention of their employers or a relevant organisation, they are protected in certain circumstances under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998. This is commonly referred to as 'blowing the whistle'. The law that protects whistle-blowers is for the public interest - so people can speak out if they find malpractice in an organisation. Blowing the whistle is more formally known as 'making a disclosure in the public interest'.
                          Qualifying disclosures are disclosures of information where the worker reasonably believes (and it is in the public interest) that one or more of the following matters is either happening, has taken place, or is likely to happen in the future.
                          • [*=left]A criminal offence
                            [*=left]The breach of a legal obligation
                            [*=left]A miscarriage of justice
                            [*=left]A danger to the health and safety of any individual
                            [*=left]Damage to the environment
                            [*=left]Deliberate attempt to conceal any of the above.

                          If a worker is going to make a disclosure it should be made to the employer first, or if they feel unable to use the organisations procedure the disclosure should be made to a prescribed person, so that employment rights are protected.
                          Workers who 'blow the whistle' on wrongdoing in the workplace can claim unfair dismissal if they are dismissed or victimised for doing so. An employee's dismissal (or selection for redundancy) is automatically considered 'unfair' if it is wholly or mainly for making a protected disclosure. From 25th June 2013 if a case goes to a tribunal and the tribunal thinks the disclosure was made in bad faith, it will have the power to reduce compensation by up to 25%.
                          A worker will have to show three things to claim PIDA protection:
                          1. [*=left]that he or she made a disclosure
                            [*=left]that they followed the correct disclosure procedure
                            [*=left]that they were dismissed or suffered a detriment as a result of making the disclosure.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Dismissal After Trial/Probationary Period

                            Originally posted by judgemental24 View Post
                            Yes i am of the opinion by raising the issue with the employer he has been labled as a troubklemaker and they are using capability as a reason to get rid of him

                            Driving laws??

                            Is that HGV, LGV, British Domestic Driving Hours??
                            7.5 Tonne, 17.5 Tonne and above??
                            Fixed static cab?
                            then i i must point you to http://www.transportoffice.gov.uk/cr...CONT067324.pdf
                            to update you

                            Driver understanding

                            Companies need to have a “safety culture” in place which ensures that drivers understand
                            weight legislation and immediately report any concerns that a vehicle is illegally overloaded to
                            their manager. Their manager should investigate all concerns immediately to prevent overloading.

                            Don't let them grind you down

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Dismissal After Trial/Probationary Period

                              Yes the manager takes over and investigates any concerns raised by the employee

                              Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999

                              The Protected Disclosure Act only applies if that discl;osure has been made to outside regulatory authorities and the employee then suffers detriment from the employer because of that disclosure

                              THERE HAS BEN NO PROTECTED DISCLOSURE MADE BY THE EMPLOYEE

                              Only a health and safety concern to the employer by the employee

                              They are using capability as an excuse to terminate his employment, not a protected disclosure

                              To claim unfair dimissal you wil have to prove your dismissal was a direct result of of raising that health and safety concern

                              An example of unfair dismissal with health and safety is if you refused to drive a lorry knowing the door does not shut properly, or drive with no wing mirrors

                              That comes under the Construction and Use Regulations by the way

                              Please cease and desist posting up links that are irrelevant, even if well meant
                              Last edited by judgemental24; 16th November 2015, 22:41:PM.

                              Comment

                              View our Terms and Conditions

                              LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                              If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                              If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.

                              Announcement

                              Collapse

                              Welcome to LegalBeagles


                              Donate with PayPal button

                              LegalBeagles is a free forum, founded in May 2007, providing legal guidance and support to consumers and SME's across a range of legal areas.

                              See more
                              See less

                              Court Claim ?

                              Guides and Letters
                              Loading...



                              Search and Compare fixed fee legal services and find a solicitor near you.

                              Find a Law Firm


                              Working...
                              X