Hi, just after some advice on what an employer legally can and can't do. I shall try and be as concise as possible.
This all relates to the Fire Service. Due to financial cuts, as has happened to most of the public sector, the Fire Service is reducing its costs by reducing staff numbers. This obviously has an impact on maintaining staffing levels.
A new idea that is likely to be imposed soon is to have just the minimum number of staff needed on duty for any given day. As a result, the extra people will be scheduled as off on leave. This is not a great deal different to previously, leave has always been preplanned in a way. However, due to trying to constantly maintain minimum staffing, a person will be scheduled to be off duty for more days than they have leave. This will result in a person "owing" the employer shifts (between 3-10 per year). The idea is that when the staffing is below the required minimum level, perhaps for sickness, the employer can recall an individual to make up this deficiency.
There is a lot of talk from both employees and employers about what and what can't be done leading to a bit of confusion. I'm just trying to get my head around it so have decided to ask here for someone externally to cast their eye over it. I'm unsure of how this repayment of shifts will work as I also believe the employer currently is! What denotes when they can ask? Most employees will have plans, holidays, childcare etc to manage - they will be aware when they are off but then may have to pay back one of these shifts at short notice. Kind of leaves everyone up in the air a bit.
This all relates to the Fire Service. Due to financial cuts, as has happened to most of the public sector, the Fire Service is reducing its costs by reducing staff numbers. This obviously has an impact on maintaining staffing levels.
A new idea that is likely to be imposed soon is to have just the minimum number of staff needed on duty for any given day. As a result, the extra people will be scheduled as off on leave. This is not a great deal different to previously, leave has always been preplanned in a way. However, due to trying to constantly maintain minimum staffing, a person will be scheduled to be off duty for more days than they have leave. This will result in a person "owing" the employer shifts (between 3-10 per year). The idea is that when the staffing is below the required minimum level, perhaps for sickness, the employer can recall an individual to make up this deficiency.
There is a lot of talk from both employees and employers about what and what can't be done leading to a bit of confusion. I'm just trying to get my head around it so have decided to ask here for someone externally to cast their eye over it. I'm unsure of how this repayment of shifts will work as I also believe the employer currently is! What denotes when they can ask? Most employees will have plans, holidays, childcare etc to manage - they will be aware when they are off but then may have to pay back one of these shifts at short notice. Kind of leaves everyone up in the air a bit.
Comment