Tweet
HI,Grateful, for your kind and thoughtful assistance.
I had a recent telephone PH couple of days ago on a remitted claim back to ET for a fresh hearing. It was remitted on respondent’s cross appeal on procedural error. EAT ordered that further evidence can be allowed if ET thinks required. I found that the Judge was biased towards me and his order following the decision did not at all reflect what has gone through in the hearing. The Judge has allowed the other party to amend their defense and dismissed my application to strike out their defense as their original defense was too insufficient. Judge also declined my application to amend issues if they were allowed amendment. Yet, Judge allowed them and declined mine. In the subsequent written order he did not mention he allowed amendment instead he only coined further particularisation by the respondent. although he allowed them to amend their defense.
I have already appealed to EAT ' biased ,apparent bias and procedural irregularity,now in the moment my appeal is in the shift stage. I copyed that to ET and requested that untill EAT 's response hold the hearing , but ET just let know the judge not going to hold the hearing , he is one who is going to hear my case !! I am confused that the judge I am not trusting and appeal to upper court ,but he is by force continue the hearing ! can you give me any advice ..any one please..can he do that ? what should i do now ?
I had a recent telephone PH couple of days ago on a remitted claim back to ET for a fresh hearing. It was remitted on respondent’s cross appeal on procedural error. EAT ordered that further evidence can be allowed if ET thinks required. I found that the Judge was biased towards me and his order following the decision did not at all reflect what has gone through in the hearing. The Judge has allowed the other party to amend their defense and dismissed my application to strike out their defense as their original defense was too insufficient. Judge also declined my application to amend issues if they were allowed amendment. Yet, Judge allowed them and declined mine. In the subsequent written order he did not mention he allowed amendment instead he only coined further particularisation by the respondent. although he allowed them to amend their defense.
I have already appealed to EAT ' biased ,apparent bias and procedural irregularity,now in the moment my appeal is in the shift stage. I copyed that to ET and requested that untill EAT 's response hold the hearing , but ET just let know the judge not going to hold the hearing , he is one who is going to hear my case !! I am confused that the judge I am not trusting and appeal to upper court ,but he is by force continue the hearing ! can you give me any advice ..any one please..can he do that ? what should i do now ?
