Hello,
I am taking my old employer to an employment tribunal over unpaid wages through wrongful dismissal and breach of contract and unpaid holiday.
On my ET1 form, i had named the respondent as (name - trading under company name)
Initially when i started ACAS conciliation i started the case as purely her name as the respondent, and not the company name however i was later advised to change it to just company name.
The respondent has sent a letter in response saying that they advise we re-issue and re-serve our claim since the respondent was incorrect, as it could not be the company name due to it not being a 'separate entity'?
The company is a partnership and there are four partners, however i have had no dealings with the other four partners and the actions/letters in questions have all been signed by her - the lady i want to make the claim against.
I have tried contacting ACAS again and they each tell me different things, but for a partnership company do i list the respondent as 'name of individual trading as company name' or 'name of all four partners trading as company name' or just simply the company name?
It appears that the 'respondent' is trying to get the case thrown out of court on a technicality, however the judge had simply asked us to accept if we wanted to change the name of the case respondent. What will be the effect of a possible name change in the respondent?
I would really appreciate any help at all,
Many thanks.
I am taking my old employer to an employment tribunal over unpaid wages through wrongful dismissal and breach of contract and unpaid holiday.
On my ET1 form, i had named the respondent as (name - trading under company name)
Initially when i started ACAS conciliation i started the case as purely her name as the respondent, and not the company name however i was later advised to change it to just company name.
The respondent has sent a letter in response saying that they advise we re-issue and re-serve our claim since the respondent was incorrect, as it could not be the company name due to it not being a 'separate entity'?
The company is a partnership and there are four partners, however i have had no dealings with the other four partners and the actions/letters in questions have all been signed by her - the lady i want to make the claim against.
I have tried contacting ACAS again and they each tell me different things, but for a partnership company do i list the respondent as 'name of individual trading as company name' or 'name of all four partners trading as company name' or just simply the company name?
It appears that the 'respondent' is trying to get the case thrown out of court on a technicality, however the judge had simply asked us to accept if we wanted to change the name of the case respondent. What will be the effect of a possible name change in the respondent?
I would really appreciate any help at all,
Many thanks.
Comment