Unfoarunately my son has been notified that he is to be made redundant. He has been with his firm over 6 years, during which time the company has been split and changed, but his service has been continuious. Many people along the way in these changes have been made redundant.
The reason given was that his job is no longer available due to changes that will make his section non existant. The only job offers were at two branches that were many hours away and so, were not suitable for that reason.
The company have offered enhanced redundancy payment, payment in lieu of notice etc and advised him that he may seek legal advice but if he uses the legal representative of the company, then they will pay for those services.
The reason for this post is to ask about the Terms of Agreement that he has been asked to sign, on which he has yet to be avised. The agreement shows all the terms and clarifies that the first £30,000 of redundancy pay is not taxed, but goes on to say that he accepts that he is not neing made redundant, but leaving employment.
Something sounds very wrong with this.
If there is a delay in him finding a new job, will he become unable to claim unemployment benefit by leaving rather than being made redundant?
What will he miss out on by falsifying his signature on such a document and although being made redundant, is signing to say he is leaving?
What will the company gain by getting an employee to sign this when is is actually being made redundant.
I am just concerned that he is being asked to sign something that is incorrect in his any my understanding.
Sam
The reason given was that his job is no longer available due to changes that will make his section non existant. The only job offers were at two branches that were many hours away and so, were not suitable for that reason.
The company have offered enhanced redundancy payment, payment in lieu of notice etc and advised him that he may seek legal advice but if he uses the legal representative of the company, then they will pay for those services.
The reason for this post is to ask about the Terms of Agreement that he has been asked to sign, on which he has yet to be avised. The agreement shows all the terms and clarifies that the first £30,000 of redundancy pay is not taxed, but goes on to say that he accepts that he is not neing made redundant, but leaving employment.
Something sounds very wrong with this.
If there is a delay in him finding a new job, will he become unable to claim unemployment benefit by leaving rather than being made redundant?
What will he miss out on by falsifying his signature on such a document and although being made redundant, is signing to say he is leaving?
What will the company gain by getting an employee to sign this when is is actually being made redundant.
I am just concerned that he is being asked to sign something that is incorrect in his any my understanding.
Sam
Comment