In 2010 I was subject to a campaign of bullying by my Supervisors within the Police. I took out an ET but due to my deteriorating mental health I settled with the force and signed a COT3 in 2012. My understanding of the COT3 was that I could not use any of the allegations in any further actions against the Police( fair enough I would say)
My health did not improve and I was sectioned twice in the following year and subsequently I left the Police with a medical pension in 2013. I applied for an injury pension saying I believed the injury to my mental health was as a result of me being on duty and the actions by the police caused the injuries.
The injury pension is a ' no fault' pension so I do not have to prove the actions took place just that I suffered from stress etc whilst at work which then caused the mental illness.
The Police have now objected to my referring to the incidents at the appeal board due to the agreement of the COT3. I find this difficult to link to my appeal as I am not seeking an action against the Police but wanting to show a pattern of behaviour which ultimately led to me being sat covered in petrol whilst flicking a lighter. Also the Police are saying that what they did to me was lawful as I am subject to obeying lawful orders..obviously some things were done to me which do not come anywhere near to being a lawful order but amounted to sheer vindictiveness.
I have wrote back saying I do not believe I am taking any action against the Police and that it is unjust and unfair to try to stop me using the incidents if they are submitting to the appeal that their actions were lawful. I must be allowed to mention the incidents if I am to counter this argument. However I would agree to not mentioning the ET if they agree that I was injured whilst at work due to the actions they took
Thoughts anyone.?
My health did not improve and I was sectioned twice in the following year and subsequently I left the Police with a medical pension in 2013. I applied for an injury pension saying I believed the injury to my mental health was as a result of me being on duty and the actions by the police caused the injuries.
The injury pension is a ' no fault' pension so I do not have to prove the actions took place just that I suffered from stress etc whilst at work which then caused the mental illness.
The Police have now objected to my referring to the incidents at the appeal board due to the agreement of the COT3. I find this difficult to link to my appeal as I am not seeking an action against the Police but wanting to show a pattern of behaviour which ultimately led to me being sat covered in petrol whilst flicking a lighter. Also the Police are saying that what they did to me was lawful as I am subject to obeying lawful orders..obviously some things were done to me which do not come anywhere near to being a lawful order but amounted to sheer vindictiveness.
I have wrote back saying I do not believe I am taking any action against the Police and that it is unjust and unfair to try to stop me using the incidents if they are submitting to the appeal that their actions were lawful. I must be allowed to mention the incidents if I am to counter this argument. However I would agree to not mentioning the ET if they agree that I was injured whilst at work due to the actions they took
Thoughts anyone.?
Comment