Hi,
I have received a job offer which is great apart from something in the contract about working hours which worries me a little.
Basically the contract states that when required to work outside normal hours (9 to 5) I agree that this may involve doing greater than 48 hrs in a week.
It then states that if I wish to not work more than 48 hours that I have to provide the company with 3 months notice.
I've checked the law on this (https://www.gov.uk/maximum-weekly-wo...hours/overview) and it says that you have to give an employer notice if you want to opt out of the 48 hour working week limit.
Therefore the contract actually opts you out by default, and states that you must give notice to opt back in. Is this normal? I would never have expected any contract to say I'm prepared to work MORE than 48 hours a week by default. That's like working even greater hours than 9am to 8pm every day of the week, and I cannot think of circumstances whereby this would be necessary in my profession - which I've been in for some 14 years now.
Has anyone else seen anything else like this almost inverse version of the opt-out rule?
Thanks in advance!
I have received a job offer which is great apart from something in the contract about working hours which worries me a little.
Basically the contract states that when required to work outside normal hours (9 to 5) I agree that this may involve doing greater than 48 hrs in a week.
It then states that if I wish to not work more than 48 hours that I have to provide the company with 3 months notice.
I've checked the law on this (https://www.gov.uk/maximum-weekly-wo...hours/overview) and it says that you have to give an employer notice if you want to opt out of the 48 hour working week limit.
Therefore the contract actually opts you out by default, and states that you must give notice to opt back in. Is this normal? I would never have expected any contract to say I'm prepared to work MORE than 48 hours a week by default. That's like working even greater hours than 9am to 8pm every day of the week, and I cannot think of circumstances whereby this would be necessary in my profession - which I've been in for some 14 years now.
Has anyone else seen anything else like this almost inverse version of the opt-out rule?
Thanks in advance!
Comment