My employer called me in for a meeting during a period where I do not work (children's school hols) saying that we needed to meet to discuss how my role would change given the imminent implementation of a manufacturing system. I went in expecting to hear that my position was going to expand, however, my manager told me that as 70% of my role was taken up with processing invoices, and that the manu. system would be doing this, then that part of my role would be redundant and did I have any ideas about where else I could work within the organisation. The company only employs about 25 staff. I replied that I had always been hugely flexible in terms of areas where I could work and hours that I work, I also commented that the invoicing part of my role only constituted about 20% of my workload (and I can provide evidence for this). I suspect that the new HR manager (who has not liked the flexibility of my contract) is trying to get rid of me as there will be the need for maternity cover in January (a role I was initially taken on to do before being offered a permanent position) and they don't seem to be considering me for this. I have a clean disciplinary record, was awarded a bonus in June...this really has stunned me. My next meeting is on my return to work date of 6th Sept. Even though the meeting wasn't declared as such...was it a redundancy consultation? in the (inaccurate) minutes sent to me, it was stated that my role was to be redundant but that they stressed that I would not necessarily be redundant. I haven't a clue what is going on. I have sent a letter in (as requested...containing my considered options!!??) but I have just said that the minutes were not a true reflection of the meeting and that I refute that 70% of my workload is taken up with invoicing. I have also reiterated that I can be flexible with my working hours. Without doubt the company will have to employ someone in Jan to cover the maternity leave. Can anyone let me know wheter or not the company have followed the correct procedures?
Out of the blue
Collapse
Loading...
X
-
Re: Out of the blue
Hi Onthe brink, & welcome to Legal Beagles.
It looks as if the employer is approaching you on an informal(ish) basis to let you know the state of affairs, & to explore possibilities.
If redundancy does become more of a probability, the meetings should be more formal.
ACAS give guidance on this
http://www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=1365CAVEAT LECTOR
This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)
You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
Cohen, Herb
There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
gets his brain a-going.
Phelps, C. C.
"They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
The last words of John Sedgwick
View our Terms and Conditions
LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.
If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.
If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Announcement
Collapse
Court Claim ?
Guides and LettersSHORTCUTS
Pre-Action Letters
First Steps
Check dates
Income/Expenditure
Acknowledge Claim
CCA Request
CPR 31.14 Request
Subject Access Request Letter
Example Defence
Set Aside Application
Witness Statements
Directions Questionnaire
Statute Barred Letter
Voluntary Termination: Letter Templates
A guide to voluntary termination: Your rights
Loading...
Loading...
Comment