i am employed by a national company with a very high staff ratio. i am a union branch official on full time release to carry out my area trade union duties
now i have been fighting for the last 18 months my employer as they want end of me stating ill health retirment due to my ailment. (having a old style 40 hour contract and being a pain in the gluteus maximus also no doubt) that is no problem as i have it confirmed i am covered under the equalities act so that is not the issue. me having a diploma in employment law is an advantage also
this campaign against me has been sustained for the last three months with vigour and i have just found out why for the following reasons
all full time staff that have left the business during the last three years have not been replaced with full time staff
they have been replaced by fixed term contracts,the norm has been to get rid of them prior to the end of 12 weeks and then re-employ them again negating the agency workers directive
some staff on the early temporary contracts are still with us and are approaching the two year service mark.
we have a national agreement that states any temporary staff who have two years continious service have to be made up to full time status
the business has just sent these people new contracts of employment to sign alltering their termination date from april next year to october this year.
this will mean the staff are just under the two year service mark and the business will just get rid of them rather than take them on full time contracts.
no union involvement at local level
no individual consultation
unilateral change of a contract of employment
just relying on peoples ignorance on employment law
these staff members are in my home office but i think they are seeing if they can get it past me first before going area wide with this policy
so they think they can just alter a contract of employment mid term to get rid of more staff do they
think again
if staff are offered a package to leave then i have no complaints, but a sledge hammer approach, they will have me to deal with
comments please people
now i have been fighting for the last 18 months my employer as they want end of me stating ill health retirment due to my ailment. (having a old style 40 hour contract and being a pain in the gluteus maximus also no doubt) that is no problem as i have it confirmed i am covered under the equalities act so that is not the issue. me having a diploma in employment law is an advantage also
this campaign against me has been sustained for the last three months with vigour and i have just found out why for the following reasons
all full time staff that have left the business during the last three years have not been replaced with full time staff
they have been replaced by fixed term contracts,the norm has been to get rid of them prior to the end of 12 weeks and then re-employ them again negating the agency workers directive
some staff on the early temporary contracts are still with us and are approaching the two year service mark.
we have a national agreement that states any temporary staff who have two years continious service have to be made up to full time status
the business has just sent these people new contracts of employment to sign alltering their termination date from april next year to october this year.
this will mean the staff are just under the two year service mark and the business will just get rid of them rather than take them on full time contracts.
no union involvement at local level
no individual consultation
unilateral change of a contract of employment
just relying on peoples ignorance on employment law
these staff members are in my home office but i think they are seeing if they can get it past me first before going area wide with this policy
so they think they can just alter a contract of employment mid term to get rid of more staff do they
think again
if staff are offered a package to leave then i have no complaints, but a sledge hammer approach, they will have me to deal with
comments please people
Comment