Hi all,
Can anyone help - what's the legal situation on this one please....
We have all just been 'benchmarked' - and in a goodly percentage of cases this has been used to justify no pay rises this year as we are 'overpaid' as far as the 'benchmarking exercise' goes
However - all requests to be told what our notional 'benchmark salary' should be and how it was arrived at are being refused. Our HR people are claiming that what our 'benchmark' salaries are is covered by 'Intellectual Property Rights' - ie because it's dropped out of the bottom of some benchmarking algorithm we are not allowed to know what it is or how they arrived at it. I believe the people they employed to do the benchmark may have been Towers Watson.
This sounds like a total get-out to me, surely they MUST have to tell you what your 'benchmark' salary is and how they arrived at it, especially when they are using it to say 'you're overpaid already' ? If they refuse to tell you anything then you can't even meaningfully dispute it - which of course may be exactly why they won't tell us!
Does anyone know if there's any legal precedent on this one? This doesn't seem to me to be the actions of a 'reasonable employer'
Thanks,
Martin
Can anyone help - what's the legal situation on this one please....
We have all just been 'benchmarked' - and in a goodly percentage of cases this has been used to justify no pay rises this year as we are 'overpaid' as far as the 'benchmarking exercise' goes
However - all requests to be told what our notional 'benchmark salary' should be and how it was arrived at are being refused. Our HR people are claiming that what our 'benchmark' salaries are is covered by 'Intellectual Property Rights' - ie because it's dropped out of the bottom of some benchmarking algorithm we are not allowed to know what it is or how they arrived at it. I believe the people they employed to do the benchmark may have been Towers Watson.
This sounds like a total get-out to me, surely they MUST have to tell you what your 'benchmark' salary is and how they arrived at it, especially when they are using it to say 'you're overpaid already' ? If they refuse to tell you anything then you can't even meaningfully dispute it - which of course may be exactly why they won't tell us!
Does anyone know if there's any legal precedent on this one? This doesn't seem to me to be the actions of a 'reasonable employer'
Thanks,
Martin
Comment