• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.
  • If you need direct help with your employment issue you can contact us at admin@legalbeaglesgroup.com for further assistance. This will give you access to “off-forum” support on a one-to- one basis from an experienced employment law expert for which we would welcome that you make a donation to help towards their time spent assisting on your matter. You can do this by clicking on the donate button in the box below.

Circumvention of the Equality Act (2010) - In a good cause

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Circumvention of the Equality Act (2010) - In a good cause

    I am trying to get a feel for the boundaries of the Act and would really appreciate any guidance I can get…

    It is my understanding that the Equality Act (2010) makes it unlawful to positively discriminate in employment situations. Even in cases where the individual(s) involved qualify as having a protected characteristic.

    Presumably it follows that establishing a commercial enterprise comprised solely of (and limited to) individuals sharing a particular protected characteristic would be similarly unlawful. (If I’ve got this wrong, please advise).

    Here then is my problem... What if someone wished to start an organization* comprised exclusively of older persons whose principal commercial objective was to provide goods and/or services to similarly aged customers? Is there any way this could be implemented/constituted so as to not run afoul of the legislation?

    Obviously, as things currently stand, there is a yawning chasm between the Government’s stated desire to “get older people back to work” and the number of realistic options available for them to do so. Given this backdrop, such “self-help” endeavours do not seem particularly unreasonable. Especially since they have the capacity to be economically advantageous for both participants and Government alike.
    Tags: None

  • #2
    The Equality Act (https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents) has numerous sections containing exceptions. This is how provisions such as compulsory retirement ages for firefighters and airline pilots have been upheld.

    Have you considered whether any of the exceptions in the Act may apply in your scenario?
    Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.

    Litigants in Person should download and read this: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/..._in_Person.pdf

    Comment

    View our Terms and Conditions

    LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

    If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


    If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.

    Announcement

    Collapse

    Welcome to LegalBeagles


    Donate with PayPal button

    LegalBeagles is a free forum, founded in May 2007, providing legal guidance and support to consumers and SME's across a range of legal areas.

    See more
    See less

    Court Claim ?

    Guides and Letters
    Loading...



    Search and Compare fixed fee legal services and find a solicitor near you.

    Find a Law Firm


    Working...
    X