I was working for a UK company for just under a year. One day they pulled me into a meeting with my manager and the Senior HR manager. They told me they were letting me go that day. The HR manager told me I'd get a month's pay in lieu of notice, as per my contract, and that they'd top it up with an extra month in case I didn't find new work within a month.
Basically, they've reneged on the 'top-up' part. The Senior HR manager now denies this was promised, despite the fact I got this confirmed in writing after the meeting.
My argument is that I relied upon this extra month's pay as the promise changed how I looked for/ accepted new work.
Where do I stand? Do I have a good chance if I take this to a tribunal?
Is the fact this was said only by the Senior HR manager and not signed off by the director of the company relevant?
Hopefully, my manager will confirm this was said in the meeting- how useful would that be?
Lastly, I've read I have 3 months from the 'event' to make a tribunal claim. Would the relevant event be this meeting/when I stopped working or would be when I found out the issue ie when I was paid a month later?
Basically, they've reneged on the 'top-up' part. The Senior HR manager now denies this was promised, despite the fact I got this confirmed in writing after the meeting.
My argument is that I relied upon this extra month's pay as the promise changed how I looked for/ accepted new work.
Where do I stand? Do I have a good chance if I take this to a tribunal?
Is the fact this was said only by the Senior HR manager and not signed off by the director of the company relevant?
Hopefully, my manager will confirm this was said in the meeting- how useful would that be?
Lastly, I've read I have 3 months from the 'event' to make a tribunal claim. Would the relevant event be this meeting/when I stopped working or would be when I found out the issue ie when I was paid a month later?
Comment