• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.
  • If you need direct help with your employment issue you can contact us at admin@legalbeaglesgroup.com for further assistance. This will give you access to “off-forum” support on a one-to- one basis from an experienced employment law expert for which we would welcome that you make a donation to help towards their time spent assisting on your matter. You can do this by clicking on the donate button in the box below.

The ET is systemically corrupt

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The ET is systemically corrupt

    This is my crystal clear first-hand observation.

    Employment judges like nothing more than an employer's representative dictating the contents of judgments to them as it makes their job easier, and to repay the representative they'll ensure that any perverse or otherwise dubious features within the dictated findings of fact are as difficult to appeal as possible.

    Oh, and should you rely on the reconsideration process they'll find a way to pervert that outcome too. It really is a disgustingly corrupt system where lawyers and ex lawyers working as judges scratch each other's backs in covert ways.
    Tags: None

  • #2
    at times one can see discrepancies in normal county courts?? whereby solicitors etc: are seen to be coming out of court rooms when no case on, then going in when you are there doing a case, pre court case judgments comes to mind ??
    Last edited by MIKE770; 6th December 2021, 07:17:AM.

    Comment


    • #3
      employment tribunals? well can see a bit stated in # 1 above., won my case decades ago and instructions to employment representative was pay him from day 1 (3 in practice) okay! £700+ to come back to me??? Nooooooooo under section xxxx minus under section xxxxx minus under section minus xxxx grand total of (wait for it wait for it £149.67) FACT!!!

      And a paragraph in the letter "If I did not agree I could take them to an Employment Tribunal" = believe it or not (the one I just came from = sick system.

      Comment

      View our Terms and Conditions

      LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

      If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


      If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.

      Announcement

      Collapse

      Welcome to LegalBeagles


      Donate with PayPal button

      LegalBeagles is a free forum, founded in May 2007, providing legal guidance and support to consumers and SME's across a range of legal areas.

      See more
      See less

      Court Claim ?

      Guides and Letters
      Loading...



      Search and Compare fixed fee legal services and find a solicitor near you.

      Find a Law Firm


      Working...
      X