This is my crystal clear first-hand observation.
Employment judges like nothing more than an employer's representative dictating the contents of judgments to them as it makes their job easier, and to repay the representative they'll ensure that any perverse or otherwise dubious features within the dictated findings of fact are as difficult to appeal as possible.
Oh, and should you rely on the reconsideration process they'll find a way to pervert that outcome too. It really is a disgustingly corrupt system where lawyers and ex lawyers working as judges scratch each other's backs in covert ways.
Employment judges like nothing more than an employer's representative dictating the contents of judgments to them as it makes their job easier, and to repay the representative they'll ensure that any perverse or otherwise dubious features within the dictated findings of fact are as difficult to appeal as possible.
Oh, and should you rely on the reconsideration process they'll find a way to pervert that outcome too. It really is a disgustingly corrupt system where lawyers and ex lawyers working as judges scratch each other's backs in covert ways.
Comment