Hello,
I have signed a settlement agreement with my employer. In there are some clauses that refer to the employment contract. At the time I believed that it referred to my most recent contract, however the contract mentioned in the settlement agreement and the copy of the contract that was supplied by the employer as part of the negotiation process was an earlier contract. This has left us with some clauses in the settlement agreement referring to clauses that make no sense in the copy of the contract that is mentioned as was supplied. To me it feels like a mistake.
My question is, how would a court look at the enforcement of the clauses in the settlement agreement. Would they look at what was meant and refer to the most recent contract of employment, or what is actually written in the agreement and refer to the earlier contract of employment.
Thanks for your time.
I have signed a settlement agreement with my employer. In there are some clauses that refer to the employment contract. At the time I believed that it referred to my most recent contract, however the contract mentioned in the settlement agreement and the copy of the contract that was supplied by the employer as part of the negotiation process was an earlier contract. This has left us with some clauses in the settlement agreement referring to clauses that make no sense in the copy of the contract that is mentioned as was supplied. To me it feels like a mistake.
My question is, how would a court look at the enforcement of the clauses in the settlement agreement. Would they look at what was meant and refer to the most recent contract of employment, or what is actually written in the agreement and refer to the earlier contract of employment.
Thanks for your time.
Comment