For the last ten years my employer has had my department work a set rota if so many days on then so many days off. Our contracts state an hourly rate of pay. For some reason the company has chosen to pay us a set amount each month (basically paid us like we were salaried not hourly).
By doing this we are technically getting paid for 6 hours each week that we do not physically work (if you break it down to the hourly rate of pay). I don’t know the company’s reasoning behind this but it’s what they have always done. It has been mentioned we get this “benefit” several times over the years. In the meeting they had with us all last week they called it a “clerical error”, which it clearly isn’t.
Now to cut costs they are basically proposing new contracts and to keep the same level of income they have been paying us for ten years we will be required to work 2 extra full days per month to cover for staff holidays / shortages. This saves the company money on overtime and gives them more flexibility with less staff. The alternative offered is we have a contract for 6 less hours and stick to the so many days on so many days off rota I’ve been on for the last decade without having to work the extra 2 days, this means I would be getting a substantial pay cut for the same work I’ve always done.
Is there anything we can do about this? It seems very unfair when so many of us have mortgages etc that were granted by the banks on the back of our payslips and yearly statements.
By doing this we are technically getting paid for 6 hours each week that we do not physically work (if you break it down to the hourly rate of pay). I don’t know the company’s reasoning behind this but it’s what they have always done. It has been mentioned we get this “benefit” several times over the years. In the meeting they had with us all last week they called it a “clerical error”, which it clearly isn’t.
Now to cut costs they are basically proposing new contracts and to keep the same level of income they have been paying us for ten years we will be required to work 2 extra full days per month to cover for staff holidays / shortages. This saves the company money on overtime and gives them more flexibility with less staff. The alternative offered is we have a contract for 6 less hours and stick to the so many days on so many days off rota I’ve been on for the last decade without having to work the extra 2 days, this means I would be getting a substantial pay cut for the same work I’ve always done.
Is there anything we can do about this? It seems very unfair when so many of us have mortgages etc that were granted by the banks on the back of our payslips and yearly statements.
Comment