I hope someone will be able to assist with this issue.
I had been on furlough for 5 months (combination of stress and company happy with putting me on furlough) when the company rang me and offered a way to exit the company by way of settlement agreement. They verbally offered a £x ex gratia payment plus 1 month notice pay.
My notice period is actually 12 weeks. I didn't query this with them at the time as I didn't know even what the term settlement agreement was, and thought the 1 month must have been a mistake.
By email I said I wanted to pursue exiting the company by settlement agreement.
When receiving the draft settlement agreement, they had simply taken the £x ex gratia payment and used it to mostly pay for the 12 weeks notice pay. They definitely did not say they were going to do this in our verbal discussion. So I end up with a much lower ex gratia payment than they offered, and much lower offer overall.
I was very unhappy about this, and argued the point for the next 6 weeks.
They have now retracted the settlement agreement. They have justified their action by stating this was actually a 'termination by mutual agreement' all along and therefore they are within their rights to use the £x ex gratia payment to pay for the notice pay. They did not use the term 'termination by mutual agreement' at any point until they retracted the settlement agreement. They even admit that they didnt make this clear in email.
I am very unhappy they have done this as I think they have been very deceitful, but obviously do understand they are free to withdraw the agreement.
My question is are they correct to term this as a termination by mutual agreement, 8 weeks after stating all they way along that it was a settlement agreement. Have they acted unlawfully? Can I raise a grievance against them for their action?
Thank you! (This has caused me weeks and weeks of stress and not sleeping)
I had been on furlough for 5 months (combination of stress and company happy with putting me on furlough) when the company rang me and offered a way to exit the company by way of settlement agreement. They verbally offered a £x ex gratia payment plus 1 month notice pay.
My notice period is actually 12 weeks. I didn't query this with them at the time as I didn't know even what the term settlement agreement was, and thought the 1 month must have been a mistake.
By email I said I wanted to pursue exiting the company by settlement agreement.
When receiving the draft settlement agreement, they had simply taken the £x ex gratia payment and used it to mostly pay for the 12 weeks notice pay. They definitely did not say they were going to do this in our verbal discussion. So I end up with a much lower ex gratia payment than they offered, and much lower offer overall.
I was very unhappy about this, and argued the point for the next 6 weeks.
They have now retracted the settlement agreement. They have justified their action by stating this was actually a 'termination by mutual agreement' all along and therefore they are within their rights to use the £x ex gratia payment to pay for the notice pay. They did not use the term 'termination by mutual agreement' at any point until they retracted the settlement agreement. They even admit that they didnt make this clear in email.
I am very unhappy they have done this as I think they have been very deceitful, but obviously do understand they are free to withdraw the agreement.
My question is are they correct to term this as a termination by mutual agreement, 8 weeks after stating all they way along that it was a settlement agreement. Have they acted unlawfully? Can I raise a grievance against them for their action?
Thank you! (This has caused me weeks and weeks of stress and not sleeping)
Comment