Hello, thank you so much for being here!
I am stepping in on behalf of my father who isn't very well at the moment and have a few employment contract questions. He is about to take on a new member of staff and they have been shown their contract - they have raised a few questions.
Below are the remarks they have made in an email to him:
"There are a couple of clauses that I feel could be reviewed, the Deduction of pay clause, for example: 'The Employer shall be entitled to suspend the Employee’s employment without pay in the event of the Employee refusing to obey a lawful order including (but not restricted to) those given to comply with the Employer’s statutory obligations.' This clause as written is describing one of the 'fair reasons for dismissal' in a disciplinary process but I feel it is not necessary to have it listed in the contract. If a situation were to arise that would lead to suspension or even dismissal, I would be entitled to a fair investigation and disciplinary process regardless of such a clause. Suspension should be paid pending investigation, as it should not be used as punishment and while I accept that failure to follow the procedures for suspension may result in unpaid suspension, I do not agree to it under any other circumstances."
"Clause 22, Indemnity, I feel also needs to be reviewed:'The Employee will indemnify the Employer in respect of any liability incurred by the Employer as a direct consequence of the Employee’s negligence, breach of contract, breach of duty or breach of trust in relation to the affairs of the employer.' This is a little too unclear, I would like for any negligence and dishonesty to be evidenced via a fair disciplinary process, I am not comfortable signing a blanket statement to accept responsibility within my contract."
Please could you advise how he should respond.
I am stepping in on behalf of my father who isn't very well at the moment and have a few employment contract questions. He is about to take on a new member of staff and they have been shown their contract - they have raised a few questions.
Below are the remarks they have made in an email to him:
"There are a couple of clauses that I feel could be reviewed, the Deduction of pay clause, for example: 'The Employer shall be entitled to suspend the Employee’s employment without pay in the event of the Employee refusing to obey a lawful order including (but not restricted to) those given to comply with the Employer’s statutory obligations.' This clause as written is describing one of the 'fair reasons for dismissal' in a disciplinary process but I feel it is not necessary to have it listed in the contract. If a situation were to arise that would lead to suspension or even dismissal, I would be entitled to a fair investigation and disciplinary process regardless of such a clause. Suspension should be paid pending investigation, as it should not be used as punishment and while I accept that failure to follow the procedures for suspension may result in unpaid suspension, I do not agree to it under any other circumstances."
"Clause 22, Indemnity, I feel also needs to be reviewed:'The Employee will indemnify the Employer in respect of any liability incurred by the Employer as a direct consequence of the Employee’s negligence, breach of contract, breach of duty or breach of trust in relation to the affairs of the employer.' This is a little too unclear, I would like for any negligence and dishonesty to be evidenced via a fair disciplinary process, I am not comfortable signing a blanket statement to accept responsibility within my contract."
Please could you advise how he should respond.
Comment