Hi,
I was wondering if you could help clarify something for me?
I recently approached my employer for a pay rise, citing market rates. I didn't specify an amount, as I didn't want to limit any potential rise. My request for a pay rise has been refused.
About 2 weeks later, my employer started advertising for another role in our team, identical to mine, and the salary range is more than they're paying me.
I have highlighted this with my employer - the company has shown that it values this role at a certain salary range and that I logically feel like I should be on a salary within that range.
I am waiting for their reply.
In the meantime, I have been trying to find out if they'd be breaking the law by paying another person a higher salary for the same job.
I called ACAS who said they'd only be breaking the law if they hired someone of the opposite sex to me in the new role and paid them more.
However, on UNISON's site, there appears to be some contradiction:
https://www.unison.org.uk/get-help/k...pay/equal-pay/
"Key facts
...
You are entitled to the same pay as anyone doing the same or broadly similar job, or a job of equal value, regardless of gender.
..."
Anyone... regardless of gender. I'm male, so if they hire another male into the new role and he gets paid more than me, my employer is breaking the law?
I queried this with UNISON through their web form but I was told on the phone by them prior to this, that because I'm not a UNISON member, it'd be unlikely that they'd reply.
The job description matches what I've already done with my company - I'm almost tempted to apply for it myself, if I'm feeling a bit mischievous!
Please can you advise who is right, or whether I'm reading this wrong?
Thank you
I was wondering if you could help clarify something for me?
I recently approached my employer for a pay rise, citing market rates. I didn't specify an amount, as I didn't want to limit any potential rise. My request for a pay rise has been refused.
About 2 weeks later, my employer started advertising for another role in our team, identical to mine, and the salary range is more than they're paying me.
I have highlighted this with my employer - the company has shown that it values this role at a certain salary range and that I logically feel like I should be on a salary within that range.
I am waiting for their reply.
In the meantime, I have been trying to find out if they'd be breaking the law by paying another person a higher salary for the same job.
I called ACAS who said they'd only be breaking the law if they hired someone of the opposite sex to me in the new role and paid them more.
However, on UNISON's site, there appears to be some contradiction:
https://www.unison.org.uk/get-help/k...pay/equal-pay/
"Key facts
...
You are entitled to the same pay as anyone doing the same or broadly similar job, or a job of equal value, regardless of gender.
..."
Anyone... regardless of gender. I'm male, so if they hire another male into the new role and he gets paid more than me, my employer is breaking the law?
I queried this with UNISON through their web form but I was told on the phone by them prior to this, that because I'm not a UNISON member, it'd be unlikely that they'd reply.
The job description matches what I've already done with my company - I'm almost tempted to apply for it myself, if I'm feeling a bit mischievous!
Please can you advise who is right, or whether I'm reading this wrong?
Thank you
Comment