Good afternoon,
I began employment with a local law firm as a Fee Earnee with contractual promise to be given a training contract after 12 months.
I was eventually given the TC and registered with the SRA as promised. However i was required to sign an additional contract which amended the initial contract. The provisions contained in the amendment states that i must pay a "financial penalty / refund" of costs the firm has incurred plus £6.5k if i leave within two years of qualifying. I understand the cost of training course etc is reasonable but £6.5k cannot be proved as a loss. Am I correct in stating that this as a penalty claue would be void and thus unenforceable? If i had known of these arbitrary clauses I would never have agreed to begin working at the firm in the first place. After spendinga year there on lower salary I feel like i had no choice but to sign the amendment in ant event.
The same contract referred to above also states i will get paid 22 - 26k, the market salary for a newly qualified solicitor. Now I have qualified after completing the TC and having looked for jobs, I can see that competitors are offering more money than the bracket, will this not be the market rate. I have relyed this to the firm and also advised non-qualified staff at the firm are paid 25k so it does not make sense for a nq sol to be paid 1k more!
I am due to have salary discussions this coming week and as the highest biller at the firm, i am expecting a good salary. However given the attitude, and ego, of the Partners it is unlikely we will be able to agree salary as they still seem to think i owe them because they gave me a TC.
My next question is that if i do not sign another contract having qualified, would I still be bound by the 3 month notice period as stated in my initial contract as a
fee earner or as i am without a contract would the 2 week statutory notice apply?
Any advice will be appreciated.
Regards
I began employment with a local law firm as a Fee Earnee with contractual promise to be given a training contract after 12 months.
I was eventually given the TC and registered with the SRA as promised. However i was required to sign an additional contract which amended the initial contract. The provisions contained in the amendment states that i must pay a "financial penalty / refund" of costs the firm has incurred plus £6.5k if i leave within two years of qualifying. I understand the cost of training course etc is reasonable but £6.5k cannot be proved as a loss. Am I correct in stating that this as a penalty claue would be void and thus unenforceable? If i had known of these arbitrary clauses I would never have agreed to begin working at the firm in the first place. After spendinga year there on lower salary I feel like i had no choice but to sign the amendment in ant event.
The same contract referred to above also states i will get paid 22 - 26k, the market salary for a newly qualified solicitor. Now I have qualified after completing the TC and having looked for jobs, I can see that competitors are offering more money than the bracket, will this not be the market rate. I have relyed this to the firm and also advised non-qualified staff at the firm are paid 25k so it does not make sense for a nq sol to be paid 1k more!
I am due to have salary discussions this coming week and as the highest biller at the firm, i am expecting a good salary. However given the attitude, and ego, of the Partners it is unlikely we will be able to agree salary as they still seem to think i owe them because they gave me a TC.
My next question is that if i do not sign another contract having qualified, would I still be bound by the 3 month notice period as stated in my initial contract as a
fee earner or as i am without a contract would the 2 week statutory notice apply?
Any advice will be appreciated.
Regards
Comment