Long story short: I have full PR for my son. When my son was 10, the school suddenly stopped providing me with educational records or copies of work, while continuing to provide the same to his mother.
They were coming up with weird stuff like talking about his "Gillick competency" which seems irrelevant in this situation.
They also mentioned advice from the ICO, but when I called the ICO to tell them what the school had told me, they said it doesn't sound like something they would advise on.
The school and LEA then refused to expand any more, provide any SAR response, the portfolio holder for education vanished off the face of the planet.
Now there's a new head of education, I thought I'd request a meeting - I was met with the following response, most of which is not correct.
Do I not have a right to request such a meeting in any case, whether THEY like it or not?
They were coming up with weird stuff like talking about his "Gillick competency" which seems irrelevant in this situation.
They also mentioned advice from the ICO, but when I called the ICO to tell them what the school had told me, they said it doesn't sound like something they would advise on.
The school and LEA then refused to expand any more, provide any SAR response, the portfolio holder for education vanished off the face of the planet.
Now there's a new head of education, I thought I'd request a meeting - I was met with the following response, most of which is not correct.
Do I not have a right to request such a meeting in any case, whether THEY like it or not?
Following you[sic] request to meet I have carried out internal conversations with my team and my understanding is the issues you have raised have been previously resolved and there is no need for us to meet to discuss further.
In terms of your first point regarding XXXX school withholding information to which you have a right, and you receiving no explanation is not correct. Following internal discussions and a review of the relevant paperwork I can confirm the correct processes were followed and the School and Information Compliance Team made the decision based on the advice from the ICO, the Mothers consent and the child’s wish to confirm his position in relation to the SAR. This decision and explanation was presented to you at the time.
The second matter regarding a name change at XXXX High School has been resolved by the school and therefore there is no further action for the School Service.
Kind regards, XXXX
In terms of your first point regarding XXXX school withholding information to which you have a right, and you receiving no explanation is not correct. Following internal discussions and a review of the relevant paperwork I can confirm the correct processes were followed and the School and Information Compliance Team made the decision based on the advice from the ICO, the Mothers consent and the child’s wish to confirm his position in relation to the SAR. This decision and explanation was presented to you at the time.
The second matter regarding a name change at XXXX High School has been resolved by the school and therefore there is no further action for the School Service.
Kind regards, XXXX
Comment