Re: Court Claim Rec'd: BW Legal/PRAC/PAYDAY UK loan
You need to keep the DQ and 'Without Prejudice' offer letters separate.
Serve the DQ with a one-liner covering letter simply telling them it's enclosed and filed at court (as you have suggested in your post).
I can see from post # 21 that the Claimant has made you a WP offer. Any reply you make must be headed 'Without Prejudice' in order to protect your legal position.
Your response to any offer should be to accept, reject, counter-offer or ignore it.
The letter you've drafted doesn't really do any of those things (possibly a rejection) while at the same time telling them that you "look forward to receiving the outstanding documentation" which I doubt you really want to happen
The court may take the view that your letter is an admission of the debt when you imply your only quarrel is they've added legal fees/costs to the amount you've been discussing in earlier correspondence with them.
Any letter written to the other side has the potential to be disclosed in court by them (unless headed Without Prejudice). If I were to receive your letter I would include it as evidence of admission in my Witness Statement.
File and serve your DQ and then maybe tweak the wording of your response to their WP offer letter.
Di
Originally posted by Bigmac799
View Post
You need to keep the DQ and 'Without Prejudice' offer letters separate.
Serve the DQ with a one-liner covering letter simply telling them it's enclosed and filed at court (as you have suggested in your post).
I can see from post # 21 that the Claimant has made you a WP offer. Any reply you make must be headed 'Without Prejudice' in order to protect your legal position.
Your response to any offer should be to accept, reject, counter-offer or ignore it.
The letter you've drafted doesn't really do any of those things (possibly a rejection) while at the same time telling them that you "look forward to receiving the outstanding documentation" which I doubt you really want to happen
The court may take the view that your letter is an admission of the debt when you imply your only quarrel is they've added legal fees/costs to the amount you've been discussing in earlier correspondence with them.
Any letter written to the other side has the potential to be disclosed in court by them (unless headed Without Prejudice). If I were to receive your letter I would include it as evidence of admission in my Witness Statement.
Originally posted by Bigmac799
View Post
File and serve your DQ and then maybe tweak the wording of your response to their WP offer letter.
Di
Comment