**STRUCK OUT** BC/lowell vs looneybear pls help

[nemesis45]

Re: BC/lowell vs looneybear pls help

Hello @nemesis45
Just to keep you updated, I delivered my witness statement to the courts and Lowells on time. To date I have received no paperwork requested (CPR CCA) , also no introduction to new solicitor, no contact from them whatsoever.
I rang the county court on Thursday and they have not even received a witness statement from Lowells. (It was ordered to be in by 16th March)
My court case is in 3 weeks, what happens now, will the court case go ahead ?

Hello LB the two most likely outcomes 1, Lowell Discontinues the claim, end of story. 2. They fail to respond or file a WS and the court acts of its own volition and either strikes out the claim straight away, the is a slim chance BW/Lowell could seek relief from sanctions and ask to file a WS that's up to a judge to decide.

nem

[looneybear]

Re: BC/lowell vs looneybear pls help

Ok thank you for your help nem, and I will keep you updated

[looneybear]

Re: BC/lowell vs looneybear pls help

STRUCK OUT !!! Thank you so much for this wonderful website! You folks are amazing
Thank you [MENTION=55034]nemesis45[/MENTION]

I turned up at court today and the judge said that Lowells had sent them an urgent email yesterday seeking an adjournment. The court responded with "have you sought permission?" They hadn't , so adjournment was denied. The judge struck it out as they hadn't sent witness statement , hadn't provided any docs and hadn't bothered to turn up. He also put note on telling them not to bother seeking relief from sanctions /trying again! So put that up your pipeholes LOWlifes!

Once again thank you so so much xxx

[MIKE770]

Re: BC/lowell vs looneybear pls help

well done - they have been well and truly turned over these Lowlifes *scrum! * Keeping language a little polite!

[nemesis45]

Re: BC/lowell vs looneybear pls help

STRUCK OUT !!! Thank you so much for this wonderful website! You folks are amazing
Thank you @nemesis45

I turned up at court today and the judge said that Lowells had sent them an urgent email yesterday seeking an adjournment. The court responded with "have you sought permission?" They hadn't , so adjournment was denied. The judge struck it out as they hadn't sent witness statement , hadn't provided any docs and hadn't bothered to turn up. He also put note on telling them not to bother seeking relief from sanctions /trying again! So put that up your pipeholes LOWlifes!

Once again thank you so so much xxx

That's excellent news!!! Well Done.
Beginning to look like Lowlife solicitors are just as sloppy as Carter & Co were.

Good comment from the judge too.

nem

[Amethyst]

Re: BC/lowell vs looneybear pls help

Great news well done [MENTION=72670]looneybear[/MENTION] & [MENTION=55034]nemesis45[/MENTION] - great work !

[spirit2534]

Re: BC/lowell vs looneybear pls help

Great news well done @looneybear & @nemesis45 - great work !

This case is a clear example that in many cases the only way that such as Lowell succeed is when they are not challenged.

Thank goodness we have LB to show the way!

[big_al]

Re: **STRUCK OUT** BC/lowell vs looneybear pls help

I also won in court against Lowells. They didn’t supply any information/documentation as requested by the court a few months before, so on the day they didn’t turn up, no information/documentation as requested, so the judge struck it out.

Now I thought Lowells would have removed the entry from my credit file. Went and checked my credit file and being as slippery as they are they changed the last updated to the month before the court case!

Now this is where I need some help and so will other people who have won in court against them.

The entry was due to drop off in another 8 months but now as they have changed the last updated I believe it will be another 6 years before it drops off!

How do you get the entry removed from your credit file or amended?

[nemesis45]

Re: **STRUCK OUT** BC/lowell vs looneybear pls help

I also won in court against Lowells. They didn’t supply any information/documentation as requested by the court a few months before, so on the day they didn’t turn up, no information/documentation as requested, so the judge struck it out.

Now I thought Lowells would have removed the entry from my credit file. Went and checked my credit file and being as slippery as they are they changed the last updated to the month before the court case!

Now this is where I need some help and so will other people who have won in court against them.

The entry was due to drop off in another 8 months but now as they have changed the last updated I believe it will be another 6 years before it drops off!

How do you get the entry removed from your credit file or amended?

Good morning Big_Al,

This is a common mistake with claim struck out/discontinued or won, the debt was/is unenforceable in court but the debt did/does exist in fact it remains collectable by any means bar court action.

The Information Commissioners Office regulates the Credit Ref. Agencies expects/ requires the files to show a true picture of the conduct of an account entries such as yours will remain on file until the 6th anniversary of the default date when it will be removed.

The " default date " registered originally Cannot be changed, so I suspect the " last up dated" entry is just that and not a change of the default date.

nem

[looneybear]

Re: **STRUCK OUT** BC/lowell vs looneybear pls help

Hi Big_Al . My default date says 30/7/2010 on Noddle, so it should be gone by the end of next month, if I've got that right ? I will let you know

Looneybear