Hi,
I received a CCJ this week for an unsecured debt dating back almost 7 years (11/2007). I have no recollection of the debt and therefore wish to defend it. In my defence papers I was going to put the following response, a series of events which have led to this, as follows:
"I spoke to a representative of the claimant on the phone in 2010 and again in 2011 and stated both times to them that I have no recolection of the accused debt and asked if they could provide me with some proof documentation. Both times they refused to comply and said the onus was on me to prove I didn't owe it.
I then pointed out it was impossible to 'prove' I don't owe something I have no knowledge of. Their response was tough. I told them I was not willing to discuss it further until I had written proof the alleged debt was mine. Cabot ignored this request and continued to harass me with a letter every 3-4 weeks and a phone call daily.
I sent them a statue barred letter in November 2013 informing them that this alleged debt was more than 6 years old that it has become statue barred and asked them to stop contacting me as they hadn't provided me with any other evidence. The next letter I received was 7 months later from Restons Solicitors and 2 weeks after that CCJ papers.
I have included a copy of the original letter I sent Cabot financial."
My only problem which I have since found out might go against me is the statue barred letter I sent in November wasn't sent recorded delivery, it was only done first class.
What I wish to know is is this response long winded when filling out the defence section of the forms? Is there a better way of wording things before I send my papers off? Should I include a copy of the original statue barred letter I sent in November and should I write a newer dated one out too? And should I send another copy to the claimant?
This has really got my head spinning as I have never had legal action threatened on me before and I am extremely worried about some bailiff beating on my door!
I received a CCJ this week for an unsecured debt dating back almost 7 years (11/2007). I have no recollection of the debt and therefore wish to defend it. In my defence papers I was going to put the following response, a series of events which have led to this, as follows:
"I spoke to a representative of the claimant on the phone in 2010 and again in 2011 and stated both times to them that I have no recolection of the accused debt and asked if they could provide me with some proof documentation. Both times they refused to comply and said the onus was on me to prove I didn't owe it.
I then pointed out it was impossible to 'prove' I don't owe something I have no knowledge of. Their response was tough. I told them I was not willing to discuss it further until I had written proof the alleged debt was mine. Cabot ignored this request and continued to harass me with a letter every 3-4 weeks and a phone call daily.
I sent them a statue barred letter in November 2013 informing them that this alleged debt was more than 6 years old that it has become statue barred and asked them to stop contacting me as they hadn't provided me with any other evidence. The next letter I received was 7 months later from Restons Solicitors and 2 weeks after that CCJ papers.
I have included a copy of the original letter I sent Cabot financial."
My only problem which I have since found out might go against me is the statue barred letter I sent in November wasn't sent recorded delivery, it was only done first class.
What I wish to know is is this response long winded when filling out the defence section of the forms? Is there a better way of wording things before I send my papers off? Should I include a copy of the original statue barred letter I sent in November and should I write a newer dated one out too? And should I send another copy to the claimant?
This has really got my head spinning as I have never had legal action threatened on me before and I am extremely worried about some bailiff beating on my door!
Comment